Adam Driggs

After my observations, this judge is unfortunately not fair and have racial discrimination issue. His ruling is more toward people on his same race AND he does not care about minority.

Judge Driggs is very fair and even in his rulings. He gives each case time and makes a thorough decision.

I was very impressed with Judge Driggs when I was in his courtroom with how he handled a defendant who clearly had mental health issues. Judge Driggs was very patient and respectful to the person, which was impressive. He is always very fair to both sides.

Horrible judge. Contingent of having minor child live with Mother, the custodial parent, Judge Driggs ordered on his ME in 2019 to have mother possibly medicated and do long term psychotherapy. How did mother's child modification 2017 motion turn into this nightmare. This Judge also denied outside licensed medical psychologist review of mother mental health, ex. Banner health, not agreeing to Psy.D Raymond Branton, Court appointed roster per Judge Driggs for mother's psych eval costing $ 20K w/no private insurance accepted. Both Driggs and PsyD Branton and this entire Family Court system is corrupted. URL OF cas http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?casenumber=FC2017-050317 URL of Courts of Appeal Div. 1 - Arizona https://casetext.com/case/jorgenson-v-giannecchini Per the Courts of Appeal decision on case 1 CA-CV 20-0009 and FC 1 CA-CV 20-0208 FC - Vacated and Remanded ruling, it was written - the court had no statutory power to order Mother to participate in long-term psychotherapy going forward. Courts of Appeal also added "we vacate the parenting-time ruling and all subsequent orders concerning Mother’s psychotherapy".

Terrible, this Judge obviously did not learn law in law school. He's to not understand anything when it comes to jurisdiction. Most all don't know that because they are in an active chapter 11 bankruptcy they are not even suppose to make rulings, but they simply ignore while practicing administrative law while make all litigants believe that they are practicing some form of criminal law. No criminal statues, all allege crimes are civil. The court is not even a government constructive the federal government is a Corporation.