Aileen Cannon

She's obviously in the bag for trump. She's an unqualified moron that absolutely should not be on the bench. trump appointed LOTS of unqualified, political hacks that had no business on the bench and this moron is EXAMPLE #1.

I am almost sure that every citizen in the United States can admit that this judge is bias and one sided in her decisions and she just proved just that in the case of Donald Trump case ... Appeals court said NO!!!!! and Supreme Court said NO!!!!!! to the key issues to her biased rulings without being based on the well-established law. The question remains how in the world this type of judges has long term and lifetime appointments? So, they can freely rule for their favorites!? United States making a joke from themselves by about allowing lifetime appointments of such bias judges and trashing our image internationally and domestically by a such behavior...why in the world I have to trust our constitution or our judicial system when such events happen by whatever corrupt or bias or any other reason brought by such judges who are the ones have to protect our image in the eyes of public ... if we allow without consequences of such behavior, we have no democracy and we shouldn't send false signals of pretending United States is a savior of democracy ... fortunately there's only a handful of such judges of such bias behavior and this judge one of them ... in my opinion there's must be some accountability for bias and corrupt actions and stopped hiding under judicial immunity ...

I am a lawyer who practices criminal defense regularly in federal courts nationally. I was a prosecutor for 13 years before that. I've never before posted on this site, but Judge Cannon's ruling temporarily enjoining the Trump Mar-a-Lago records investigation was so shockingly dumb that it merits comment. How can any judge rule (especially after taking days to contemplate the decision, knowing it would be scrutinized by everyone) that the government can conduct a national security assessment of the documents Trump kept, but not a criminal investigation, until the special master's work was complete? Literally everything the government might do from this point forward has elements of both. Who touched the classified documents? Why were they taken in the first place? Why had access to the information? Were the given to anyone? What was the reason that Trump's lawyer/custodian of records falsified a document saying that everything was turned over? All of these questions are pertinent to both a criminal investigation and a national security assessment. The fact that she thought this was somehow a workable solution speaks volumes not only about her legal acumen, but her basic intelligence. It is a terrible omen for litigants who come before her in the future.