Bentrish Satarzadeh

Superior Court

CaliforniaAlamedaCalifornia
1.0/ 5

2 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.0
Impartiality1.0
Case preparation1.0
Case management1.0
Quality of rulings1.0
Treatment of counsel1.0
Empathy with parties1.0
Language & clarity1.0

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (2)

Commissionaire (not a judge) Benetrish Satarzadeh acts horrifically and nefariously in both criminal and civil cases ...

1.0
/ 5

Commissionaire (not a judge) Benetrish Satarzadeh acts horrifically and nefariously in both criminal and civil cases that I have experienced with her and takes no pause to hurt children to destroy or "Erase Families" (ref. Popular YouTube video) Her modus operandi is very apparently and evident: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Cause as much confusion in the case and hate between parties by her egregious, imbalanced, unchecked, repetitive, evidently UNLAWFUL actions of: badgering, harassing, baiting, and "attempted entrapment" (ref. Caselaw against the DEA and the "Doctrine of the Poisonous Tree" - regarding evidence collected via entrapment is not admissible"), onto one or both parties to avail themselves to further admonishment, punishment onto litigants and their children, and formal causes of action by the County Judiciary and Sheriff Dept. in efforts to i) "unnecessarily prolong cases" and have as many hearings as possible and ii) "ring up" litigants on new and more actions against them to further her own career as a "Case maker / Profit generator" (via increased taxes and inflating judiciary budgets), that support and pay her salary and benefits. Specifically, to date Commissioner (not a judge) Benetrish Satarzadeh has, in fact, perpetrated the following, including but not limited to: - Mocked litigants and attorneys with her acutely disfigured and contorted facial expressions and highly condescending remarks. - Falsey i) cites the law on numerous occasions (she knows there are no cameras in the courtrooms) -- and more importantly -- ii) unlawfully uses false citations to make UNLAWFUL court orders against litigants and does VIOLATE THEIR RIGHTS. - Did VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS - FIRST ADMENDMENT of a parent litigant in the middle of giving testmoney live on the record in the courtroom, whereby the litgant was c9mplimenting the co-parent and offering more shared parenting time - that was c

AnónimoLawyer

Horrible, nefarious, rotten to the core, a very dark soul.

1.0
/ 5

Horrible, nefarious, rotten to the core, a very dark soul. Beware. Get your peremptory challenges ready. Apparently has no compunction placing young children with abusers. Hard to imagine a worse judge than this.

AnónimoLawyer