When it comes to motion practice he wants to appease both sides at all times.
When it comes to motion practice he wants to appease both sides at all times. He viewed a video of claimant in a crosswalk with the walk sign being run over, and although he granted SJ as to liability, he refused to dismiss the affirmative defense as to culpable conduct. What that does is open up claimant to liability questions at his EBT, and leaves it to the jury. How terrible of a decision when the video shows exactly what occurred, even showing the interior of defendant's vehicle where the driver is looking to his left while his vehicle travels straight thru the crosswalk. Can't get an order with teeth in this courtroom.