Daniel Juarez

Superior Court

CaliforniaLos AngelesCalifornia
2.5/ 5

4 reviews

Courtroom conduct2.5
Impartiality2.5
Case preparation2.5
Case management2.5
Quality of rulings2.5
Treatment of counsel2.5
Empathy with parties2.5
Language & clarity2.5

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (4)

MY PROBATE ESTATE OF my DADS.

2.0
/ 5

MY PROBATE ESTATE OF my DADS. THE DEFENDANT FRAUDED ALL THE PAPERWORK ANG NOTARIES WERE FAKE WITH NO journals t TO SHOW THAT THE NOTARY WAS PERFORMED PER LA COUNTY CLERK. ALSO THE DEFENDANT FATHER ROBERT HILL WAS IN A COMA AND NEVER SIGNED NO HOUSE OVER TO HER. NOW WIMA HILL -EDWARDS. Robert hill died with LUEKMIA CANCER HOW CAN A DEAD MAN IN A COMA SIGN ANYTHING. THIS WHOLE CAS IS A FRAUD. PERIODT. SOMEONE FROM THE BENCH NEED TO B HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS MISTAKE FRAUD I DID EVERYTHING BY LAW. BUT NO ONE DID LOOTERS. STEALING THIEVES 4/17/2024 PROBATE COURT. DEPT 67. JUGE JUAREZ WAS PLEASANT!!!!!

AnónimoLitigant

Biased with total done-deal predispositions in serious probate matters.

1.0
/ 5

Biased with total done-deal predispositions in serious probate matters. Allows the estate looters to lie with no evidence supporting their desire to loot estates. Decisions victimize elderly women.

AnónimoLawyer

Judge Juarez pushes settlements.

2.0
/ 5

Judge Juarez pushes settlements. He said in court he does not know how an attorney would figure out how to try a trust case. Probate courts have jurisdiction over trust cases. Makes no sense. I can tell he never reads court papers that are filed by the parties.

AnónimoLawyer

Very pleasant judge.

5.0
/ 5

Very pleasant judge. Listens well, helpful and easy going. He is the model of what a good judge should be.

AnónimoLawyer