Diana Rosario

This horrible lady sent my mom jail for debt she’s proved she cannot pay to my crack head rapist father over a divorce settlement. My mom with no prior convictions is sitting in jail for no reason at all.

Judge Diana Rosario is an evil monster who should NOT be in a position to be able to effect children's lives, she is incompetent. She gave a domestic abuser who had an order of protection on him by mother, custody of the child with out mother's knowledge. When mother tried to explain situation and how father had attempted this numerous times in the past, getting court orders with out notifying mother by lying and saying she couldn't be found.Rosario not want to admit she was wrong, and then have father order of protection on mother based on MORE lies preventing mother from seeing child. Rosario said she did this because mother didn't have lawyer, and lying criminal father did. If this isn't evil,I don't know what is.

These concerns are brought forth not out of disrespect but from a place of seeking justice and fairness in accordance with the law, specially for parents dealing with children's mental health and financial abuse from wealthier parties that use the court system to prosecute in order to bring financial burden to another. The matters outlined above have significantly impacted the proceedings of my case and my trust in the legal process. Overall, very permanent observations of Judge Rosario lies with Inconsistent Rulings: Judge Rosario's decisions have frequently appeared inconsistent with established laws and precedents. Such inconsistencies not only undermine the integrity of the legal process but also contribute to an environment of uncertainty and unfairness. Despite the tendency to Failure Enforcement of her ow Rulings: There have been instances where Judge Rosario has failed to enforce her own rulings or ensure the execution of appointed personnel's responsibilities as dictated by her decisions. This lack of enforcement undermines the effectiveness of the legal process and the authority of the court. After several years in court with Judge Rosario presiding my case to a never-ending parental allocation responsibility order, I am compelled to raise concerns about what appears to be an uneven approach to assessing parties' financial capabilities to sustain legal procedures under Judge Rosario's direction. This approach seemingly disregards the financial burden placed on individuals who may not have ample resources for protracted legal engagements. Because some salaries are above the poverty cap and therefore targeted as ineligible for "legal-Aide Assistance", even though nobody measures expenses for each household. Legal authorities find themselves entitled of appointing unnecessary procedures to force parties to resolve matters the case on their own instead of bringing it to court, when it should be her job. On that notice; there seems to be a tende