This judge doesn't know the difference between a person's rights and a ham sandwich.
2.0
/ 5
This judge doesn't know the difference between a person's rights and a ham sandwich. He allows the prosecutor to violate the alleged criminal's rights including withholding the evidence from the defense. When presented with the violations, he just doesn't care. He also has a problem with the statement "innocent until proven guilty." The defense can prove reasonable doubt until they're blue in the face and he will still find them guilty. And he ABSOLUTELY hates it when a defendant defends themself even if it's because they can't afford an attorney because he believes they are stealing from the judicial system.
AnónimoLegal Professional