Esther M. Morgenstern

[redacted] I know for a fact she had the transcript of my appearance altered by the court stenographer. She is prejudiced, a liar and not normal. Thousands of people want her off the bench in a CHANGE petition online. She is finally leaving the bench. Good riddance.

[redacted] I know for a fact she had the transcript of my appearance altered by the court stenographer. She is prejudiced, a liar and not normal. Thousands of people want her off the bench in a CHANGE petition online. She is finally leaving the bench. Good riddance.

It is very tough to rate Morgenstern accurately because the apparatus imposed upon her the duty of judging criminal, divorce and no-marital children law all in one courtroom. Added to that is the unamanagable case load that features dozens of cases each day. The results are terrible, but the judicial system is to blame, not Morgenstern. Moregenstern simply does not have the time to adequately assist the parties to present a case, so she defaults to pressurized settlements and adjournments. She is stuck with basic policy imperatives which she must enforce: protecting victims of domestic violence, favoring custody to young mothers and then to older fathers, and ordering child support. The impression is that one side, the victim, wins and the other side, the perpetrator, does not stand a chance. This is the system in every county throughout the United States today. As for expertise in the areas of the law she enforces, criminal, marital and non-marital family law, she relies on a few basics. In the minutes she has for each case, she will identify the issue, apply the tidbit of law she knows, and off goes another adjournment. She conducts trials which involve a sanitized record based on her objections rulings. These will favor the victim's side and disfavor the perpetrator's side. That is a very good way to understand Morgenstern. She is directed by her supervisors to give the public the impression she is hard on perpetrators, which is usually young fathers. We are in a victimocracy today, and the victim is the victor. The problem with this fascist approach is that men, the backbone of the family and the national economy, are systemically being trivialized by the court apparatus. Young fathers do not matter, and Morgenstern is commanded to make it that way. Thousands of judges throughout this land must make it that way. Morgenstern does the best she can, but her leadership set her up to fail. She is too powerful and too overloaded. Families are left bewilder

It is very tough to rate Morgenstern accurately because the apparatus imposed upon her the duty of judging criminal, divorce and no-marital children law all in one courtroom. Added to that is the unamanagable case load that features dozens of cases each day. The results are terrible, but the judicial system is to blame, not Morgenstern. Moregenstern simply does not have the time to adequately assist the parties to present a case, so she defaults to pressurized settlements and adjournments. She is stuck with basic policy imperatives which she must enforce: protecting victims of domestic violence, favoring custody to young mothers and then to older fathers, and ordering child support. The impression is that one side, the victim, wins and the other side, the perpetrator, does not stand a chance. This is the system in every county throughout the United States today. As for expertise in the areas of the law she enforces, criminal, marital and non-marital family law, she relies on a few basics. In the minutes she has for each case, she will identify the issue, apply the tidbit of law she knows, and off goes another adjournment. She conducts trials which involve a sanitized record based on her objections rulings. These will favor the victim's side and disfavor the perpetrator's side. That is a very good way to understand Morgenstern. She is directed by her supervisors to give the public the impression she is hard on perpetrators, which is usually young fathers. We are in a victimocracy today, and the victim is the victor. The problem with this fascist approach is that men, the backbone of the family and the national economy, are systemically being trivialized by the court apparatus. Young fathers do not matter, and Morgenstern is commanded to make it that way. Thousands of judges throughout this land must make it that way. Morgenstern does the best she can, but her leadership set her up to fail. She is too powerful and too overloaded. Families are left bewilder

Worst judge, Always on women side even my ex is indicted of abuse of my child and the child is still with my ex. She would not allow me visiting unsupervised even my ex should not be prenting the child. I am afraid and heartbroken. I wish i was not even born to see this day.

Worst judge, Always on women side even my ex is indicted of abuse of my child and the child is still with my ex. She would not allow me visiting unsupervised even my ex should not be prenting the child. I am afraid and heartbroken. I wish i was not even born to see this day.