Evon M Asforis

Despicable she needs to step down. I asked her to recuse herself from my case I had all the evidence and she ignored it. She sided with the landlord attorney believed everything he said without him having documentation. I have Disabilities and have virtual hearings That Asforis approved and Judge Jennings who I had at might second hearing approved going forward as well. Asforis Stated it’s her courtroom not judge Jennings and I said why don’t you look at what she wrote and she refused to so I sent her over the document and she still refused to. This judge does not write anything down whatsoever From one Hearing to the next, I allowed my landlord to come in for repairs 12 times in 3 months. Asforis Said I was being difficult and I need to let the landlord in I showed her the communications with the landlord, and the judge still said I was being difficult. Please look at my case I put all the evidence where it should be everything in order. This judge mocked me laughed at me And I asked her if she thought she was funny seeing that I have Disabilities. Judge Jennings on my hearing Actually reprimanded the landlords attorney. I asked her to recuse herself she should have so she dismissed my case how many other people come to her courtroom that are right who gets dismissed because of her favoritism

I agree with the unanimous comments below, that this judge has a distinct bias in favor of landlord's attorney, and basically is hostile and dismissive towards pro-se tenant litigants. She asks the landlord's attorney to summarize the case, and takes the one-sided hearsay as the facts. As a pro-se litigant I had to demand to even present my side of the case, which was ignored with eye-rolling disregard. In HP Court, the judge refused to sign a fully-negotiated Consent Order, unless I agreed to withdraw motion for sanctions and an ethics complaint I had made to the Grievance Committee against opposing counsel. This seemed a blatant act of extortion - in effort to protect opposing counsel, with whom the Judge had a long and friendly relationship. Unfortunately, Housing Court Judges do not fall under the jurisdiction of the NYS Commission on Judicial Ethics, so there is little recourse or accountability, and no place to file complaints other than letters to the supervising judges of the Housing and Civil Court. The Judge, in an HP action, refused to sign a Order to Show Cause for Harassment (before I learned that such refusals to sign OSC's are subject to review by the Appellate Term) - and tried to improperly extort withdrawal of my ethics complaint before agreeing to sign off on a Consent Order that was negotiated between the parties. Despite the fact that there are nearly 200 open HPD violations in my apartment and common areas of my building - I regret bringing an HP action with Judge Asforis on the bench. The Judge's bias and prejudice have been an open invitation for the landlord and his attorney to continue harassing me under the guise of conducting repairs. They violated the Order to Correct, but I believe there is no realistic probability of the Judge enforcing her own order via a contempt motion. I think my only recourse is to bring a harassment claim in Supreme Court, which has concurrent jurisdiction with Housing Court for harassment claims,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Petitioner-Complainant Pro Se hereby would file a Verified Complaint to the ‘NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct’ against the Manhattan Housing Court Judge (Judge Evon Asforis, and the staffs of the Supervising Judge Norma Jean Jennings). Their Misconduct involving “Ethical violations; bias/prejudice; racial discrimination; abuse power; intimidation of Petitioner Pro Se, misleading Plaintiff to sign an unreasonable ‘Settlement Agreement’ at the Courtroom 583 at 11:55AM on 4/15/2024. Other tort including “knowingly expunge Plaintiff’s Filing Documents” (25 pages of Verified Statement) etc. This Verified Complaint is the Asian Petitioner reported receiving differential treatment from the Housing Court; and I do not understand the reasons for this distinction. I regard every Judge in the Court. I would believe that the Judge has only the best intentions to be fair and impartial, but in fact, the judge seems believe the Ownwe's Attorney's one-sided story in the hearing. (especially in the Petition of HP Action). In the past hearings, I felt that the Judge refused to listen to the Petitioner’s interests; and always relies on landlords attorney’s one-sided statement. In the last hearing two days ago, I believe that the landlords’ new Attorney (Mr. James Notice, Esq) once had an Ex-parte communication with Judge Asforis (and the staffs of Supervising Judge Norma Jean Jennings) and they are “old acquaintances” with ‘conflict of interest’ in Manhattan/Bronx Housing Court. This leads to detrimental outcomes for the LEP (Limited English Proficiency, in oral English).Petitioner Pro Se, who currently has been living in the apartment (with 85 open violations for few years). In the Matter of Housing Discrimination of the long-suffering Asian tenant-Petitioner Pro Se, who would respectfully request file the ‘Verified Petition in Support of an Order to Show Cause’, requesting an Order Finding Harassment and Restraining Respondent(s) from Harassing

I represented myself pro se in a case against my landlord. The judge may has well have just walked over and kissed the landlord’s attorney on the behind. She was hostile towards me and the officers of the court were very unhelpful. It was a disgrace.

Whether she is aware of it or not, Judge Asforis has a distinct bias in favor of attorneys who appear before her on a daily basis. And given the nature of Housing Court, this is a bias mostly in favor of landlords. Regarding motions, it is not clear to me that she actually carefully reads the briefs of tenant attorneys, or that she reads them with an open mind to the possibility that they may be correct on the law and the facts. For a judge who has been on the bench for at least seven years, she has very few reported decisions. The number of Appellate Term decisions reviewing her Housing Court decisions outnumbers her reported decisions. I surmise that is because she decides most motions in handwritten decisions which do not get reviewed for publication. This practice keeps her decisions out of the public eye. She also puts enormous pressure on tenant attorneys to settle cases on terms favorable to a landlord in the interest of reducing caseload. Overwhelmed assigned counsel appearing before her on a semi-regular basis may feel compelled to go along to get along. This may clear her docket, but it tends not to work substantial justice.