Frank D. Whitney

District Court

North CarolinaNorth Carolina Western District Court4th Circuit
1.3/ 5

3 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.3
Impartiality1.3
Case preparation1.3
Case management1.3
Quality of rulings1.3
Treatment of counsel1.3
Empathy with parties1.3
Language & clarity1.3

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (3)

The judge openly attacked a retired magistrate for his political views.

2.0
/ 5

The judge openly attacked a retired magistrate for his political views. He served in the JAG while serving as an Article III judge and was openly active for Bush Republican organization. Big on railroading those accused of gang members. Refused to recuse himself in a gang case where he was a target of the gang and he relied on that fact in rulings in the case. He is excessive.

AnónimoLawyer

Judge Frank Whitney's role as Chief Judge of the Western District of North Carolina is pivotal, but controversial due...

1.0
/ 5

Judge Frank Whitney's role as Chief Judge of the Western District of North Carolina is pivotal, but controversial due to affiliations with a Confederate flag and a Robert E. Lee fraternity. In the Western District of North Carolina, Judge Frank Whitney presides, and this district unfortunately holds the poorest record for compassionate release approvals among federal court districts. Judge Frank Whitney's association with a Confederate flag and a Robert E. Lee fraternity has raised concerns regarding his impartiality and judicial conduct in the Western District of North Carolina.

AnónimoLawyer

Judge Frank Whitney's association with the Confederate flag and his reported harsh sentencing towards African America...

1.0
/ 5

Judge Frank Whitney's association with the Confederate flag and his reported harsh sentencing towards African Americans have raised concerns about his impartiality and commitment to justice. These actions can undermine public trust in the judicial system and may suggest potential bias. It's important for judges to uphold a fair and unbiased approach to ensure equal treatment for all individuals, regardless of their background.

AnónimoLawyer