Gary Nadler

Superior Court

CaliforniaSonomaCalifornia
1.8/ 5

4 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.8
Impartiality1.8
Case preparation1.8
Case management1.8
Quality of rulings1.8
Treatment of counsel1.8
Empathy with parties1.8
Language & clarity1.8

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (4)

Pretend-folksy, unpredictable, unprofessional demeanor.

2.0
/ 5

Pretend-folksy, unpredictable, unprofessional demeanor. Does not read pleadings, shows up unprepared thinking he can “wing it”. Makes serious mistakes, then becomes flippant. Somehow managed to issue separate, contradictory rulings - one for plaintiff and one for defendant! When it became obvious that he was heading for a judicial review panel, he dumped the work on litigants’ attorneys asking them to figure out a way to correct his errors. The case eventually got resolved in my favor, but not until another judge took over. His clerk was just as incompetent.

AnónimoLitigant

Cold hearted.

1.0
/ 5

Cold hearted. Uninformed. Pompous. Unable to admit when making mistake. Courtroom manner is abominable.

AnónimoLawyer

The Judge’s behavior was so egregious that his ruling was a proximate cause of my husband’s suicide just hours after ...

2.0
/ 5

The Judge’s behavior was so egregious that his ruling was a proximate cause of my husband’s suicide just hours after Judge’s unfair ruling. He was presented a fact filled case, backed up by very strong evidence. He obviously did not read the pleadings, and ruled in favor of a criminal who only appeared by phone. This was a plea for Elder Abuse protection which was denied. Unfair.

AnónimoLitigant

The Judge’s behavior was so egregious that his ruling was a proximate cause of my husband’s suicide just hours after ...

2.0
/ 5

The Judge’s behavior was so egregious that his ruling was a proximate cause of my husband’s suicide just hours after Judge’s unfair ruling. He was presented a fact filled case, backed up by very strong evidence. He obviously did not read the pleadings, and ruled in favor of a criminal who only appeared by phone. This was a plea for Elder Abuse protection which was denied. Unfair.

AnónimoLitigant