Grant Blinn

Superior Court

WashingtonPierceWashington
1.2/ 5

6 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.2
Impartiality1.2
Case preparation1.2
Case management1.2
Quality of rulings1.2
Treatment of counsel1.2
Empathy with parties1.2
Language & clarity1.2

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (6)

BEWARE!!! Biased and willfully ignorant of federal laws.

1.0
/ 5

BEWARE!!! Biased and willfully ignorant of federal laws. Penalizes lower income individuals, females and minorities. Returned over 30 weapons to known drug addict, DV perpetrator and also awarded wealthy yt man majority custody and decision making. The results have been death of a child. Staged suicide of drug addict parent by multiple gunshots while children present in the home, children who now have drug issues. Multiple police and CPS visits. A vile excuse of a human. Horrible judge. BEWARE

AnónimoLitigant

Poor. Dishonorable blinn's rulings lead to my childrens ongoing abuse and the DEATH of my son.

1.0
/ 5

Poor. Dishonorable blinn's rulings lead to my childrens ongoing abuse and the DEATH of my son. He is a biased and very vile man.

AnónimoLegal Professional

Judge very clearly is bias toward men.

1.0
/ 5

Judge very clearly is bias toward men. Be very careful. If you are an attorney reading this, and you are representing a woman, make sure to file an affidavit of prejudice. Get a new judge! Overreached his jurisdiction during Covid and enacted a parenting plan when the trial was based solely on relocation. Parenting plan should have been a separate trial.

AnónimoLegal Professional

This man is wishy washy in the extreme, defines indecisive and, in general, does not know what he is doing.

2.0
/ 5

This man is wishy washy in the extreme, defines indecisive and, in general, does not know what he is doing. Decision making is entirely result driven. Classic example of someone who went on the bench because he wasn't capable of making a living in private practice. Made exactly the opposite ruling on the same undisputed facts on SJ and reconsideration.

AnónimoLawyer

[Redactged by Ed.] Ignored & excused DV.

1.0
/ 5

[Redactged by Ed.] Ignored & excused DV. Did not follow Federal laws regarding Taxes & weapons and drug addicts. Refused to enforce support payments, disregarded medical & education records. Failure to recuse even with conflict of interest(past business involvement with family). Intentionally caused homelessnes, financial abuses and violation of due process. Very hostile in delivery and favors wealthy Caucasian men. [redacted] a blight to the already horrible "family" court system. Should NOT be in any legal profession. Should NOT be called honorable. Should be removed from ALL legal procedures.

AnónimoLegal Professional

I witness 2 x he sides with the dad and it would benefit family for the kids to be with the mom In a trail for divo...

1.0
/ 5

I witness 2 x he sides with the dad and it would benefit family for the kids to be with the mom In a trail for divorce, as he leaves the court room he says, “I find Mr Selig very credible”. When the wife’s lawyered proved the he was lying about how much he makes, how much his house is worth and how much he pays a nannie.

AnónimoLegal Professional