Jack Stoller

Best trial judge in NYC Housing Court. He checks all the boxes. Temperment, empathy, scholarship, industriousness. Wish they could clone him.

Mr. Jack is a pro real state judge a devious Caracter.

I respectfully submit this review to express my appreciation for the Honorable Judge Stoller's initial accommodations in granting time to vacate the landlord's residence. However, I must emphasize the necessity for a more comprehensive and empathetic approach towards cases involving individuals with severe medical conditions, including myself. Throughout these proceedings, there appears to have been an underestimation of the life-threatening nature of my medical concerns and an oversight of my conscientious efforts to comply with the court's directives. In considering similar cases in the future, I respectfully urge Your Honor to adopt a more compassionate and thorough review process. It is crucial to recognize the profound impact of severe medical conditions on individuals' lives and to diligently assess their efforts to meet legal obligations amidst such challenges. This approach would ensure that justice is served equitably and uphold the court's commitment to fairness and understanding. Your dismissive approach does not align with the characteristics expected of a judge tasked with upholding fair and equitable justice.

JACK STOLLER TOOK ADVANTAGE OF A WOMAN WITH DISABILITY. IT IS QUITE APPARENT THAT JACK STOLLER'S ORDER WASN'T DONE IN A LEGAL WAY. JACK STOLLER'S ORDER FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE TERRIBLE WAY HE HANDLE THE BELOW CASE AND MISREPRESENTS THE ERAP STATUTES. Stoller lied when he stated that ERAP DENIED THE TENANT HER ERAP APPLICATION. ERAP DIDN'T DENIED THE CO-TENANT HER ERAP APPLICATION. JACK STOLLER DISENFRANCHISED THE TENANT FROM HER ERAP PROTECTION SO AS TO ORDER THE SHERIFF TO DO AN ILLEGAL EVICTION AND SEIZED THIS PERSON'S PROPERTY. STOLLER LIED ON THE RECORD. THE CO-TENANT HAS A LEARNING DISABILITY BUT STOLLER REFUSED TO ORDER HER AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HER IN THE DECEMBER 5 AND 6, 2022 HEARINGS. INSTEAD STOLLER BULLDOZE THE TENANT AND TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HER WEAKNESS. STOLLER IS A FRAUD, CROOK, LIAR AND ABUSES HIS POWER TO STRIP THIS TENANT WHO HAS A LEARNING DISABILITY OF HER LEGAL RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF LANDLORDS. ON DECEMBER 5, STOLLER PROMISED THE TENANT THAT ON DECEMBER 6, 2022 HE WOULD ADDRESSED ALL ISSUES BUT INSTEAD STOLLER CAME BACK WITH A WRITTEN DECISION THAT BUTTNICK'S LAWYER APPEAR TO HAVE A COPY BEFORE IT WAS GIVEN TO THE TENANT. Even after the person was evicted on December 9, 2022. An OSC was filed on December 13, 2022 and again Stoller came up with an erroneous ORDER FULL OF LIES AND misrepresentation of the facts. BELOW IS STOLLER'S ORDER: "The Prior Order found that Respondent had previously applied for benefits under the Emergency Rent Assistance Program (“ERAP”); that the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (“OTDA”) denied both the ERAP application and internal appeals at OTDA; that the First Co-Respondent applied for ERAP after OTDA denied Respondent’s ERAP application; that OTDA had therefore already rendered a “determination of eligibility” that effectuated a vacatur of the stay occasioned by an ERAP application as provided by Section 8 of subpart A of part BB of chapter 56 of the laws of 2

Judge Jack Stoller is [Redacted by Ed.] and should be kicked off the bench. A friend of mine had an ERAP Case before Stoller and He stripped the Tenant of his ERAP. Stoller is a Pathological [Redacted by Ed.], BELOW IS PART JACK STOLLER ILLOGICAL RULING. THE TENANT DIDN'T MADE ANY SUBSEQUENT ERAP APPLICATION. THIS WAS THE TENANT FIRST ERAP APPLICATION. "Co-Respondent represents to the Court that she made a subsequent ERAP application. While Co-Respondent does not show proof of that in her order to show cause, Co-Respondent shows the Court documentation this day Co-Respondent applied for ERAP. Assuming arguendo that Co-Respondent applied for ERAP after OTDA denied Respondent's ERAP application, the wording of the statute compels a consideration of the effect of Respondent's prior ERAP application. As noted above, the statute stays eviction proceedings upon "a" determination of eligibility. The use of the indefinite article "a" in a statute as such means "one or more." Cook v. Carmen S. Pariso, 287 A.D.2d 208, 213 (4th Dept. 2001). As there has already been at least one determination of eligibility for the "household" - the unit which the statute defines as the applicant for ERAP benefits - then there has been "a" determination of eligibility and the event that effectuates a vacatur of the stay has already occurred. Accordingly, any stay incurred by ERAP is no longer in effect". FILED: NEW YORK CIVIL COURT - L&T 12/07/2022 09:57 NYSCEF RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/07/2022 JACK STOLLER LIED AND STRIPPED THE TENANT ON THEIR ERAP THUS FORCING THE TENANT TO BE HOMELESS.

Judge Jack Stoller is fair and evenhanded- His disposition is pleasant and he is just hard not to like. I wish every judge was exactly like judge Jack Stoller. NYC is very fortunate to have an ethical and genuinely caring person behind the bench. Nothing but praise for Jack Stoller