Jeffrey S. White

District Court

CaliforniaCalifornia Northern District Court9th Circuit
1.3/ 5

4 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.3
Impartiality1.3
Case preparation1.3
Case management1.3
Quality of rulings1.3
Treatment of counsel1.3
Empathy with parties1.3
Language & clarity1.3

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (4)

[Redaced by Ed.] being a judge in alameda court is a huge breach ,giving powers unjustly to coerce ,forge and commit...

1.0
/ 5

[Redaced by Ed.] being a judge in alameda court is a huge breach ,giving powers unjustly to coerce ,forge and commit fraud on and to the state of California. Causing extreme fraudulently obtained court documents . The educational process taught by this man Jeffrey white has been injunction with the rest of Northern California judicial committees formed to defraud ,enslave and cruel punishment citizens in violation of due process, 4th,1st, 14th , 6th,amendments and all of Bill of rights. The fraud and unequivocal, unjust treatment towards low income ,homeless and is a new other fraud by the courts used to harm the state of California, non natural born citizens but moreover the citizens of America who are getting [Redaactd by Ed.] But does not look like his clean slate should be giving knowing he still owes 27 million in fines and fees . [Redacted]

AnónimoLawyer

Judge Jeffrey S.

1.0
/ 5

Judge Jeffrey S. White ignored federal rules for restitution and ordered a restitution amount that the government entirely manufactured and provided no evidence to support the amount they requested. Judge White sent first time offenders to prison who other judges would have given probation. He didn’t take mental illness into consideration at all.

AnónimoLawyer

Judge White issued a ruling that wholly ignored pertinent portions of the record.

2.0
/ 5

Judge White issued a ruling that wholly ignored pertinent portions of the record. It was clear that he made up his mind on the case and wrote an opinion to fit that view. Poor quality opinion; poorly reasoned, sloppy and lazily written. Did not hold oral argument. Poor judge. I have no reason to think he's biased, but rather just doesn't take his job very seriously.

AnónimoLawyer

After his clerk told us to submit a request for oral argument on a motion, Judge White denied the same the same day h...

1.0
/ 5

After his clerk told us to submit a request for oral argument on a motion, Judge White denied the same the same day he received it, canceled a status conference, and has now sat on the (relatively simple) motion for six months. He personifies the saying that justice delayed is justice denied.

AnónimoLawyer