Th elected State District John Parrish Chupp ignores for complete the statutory provisions described in the Texas Civ...
1.0
/ 5
Th elected State District John Parrish Chupp ignores for complete the statutory provisions described in the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code of the Chapter 10 in the Section 10.003 and the Section 10.004(e) where any litigants that can be subject for monetary sanctions under the Chapter 10, Section 10.004 has the right and one opportunity to respond properly any allegations filed via a motion by the opponent party and seeking for monetary sanctions and clearly described in the Section 10.003 and also when the litigant has filed a non-suit notice for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, the judge assigned of the civil case must be issue one order to show cause and BEFORE is issued one order for voluntary dismissal without prejudice and to the litigant subject for monetary sanctions has an opportunity to respond properly for any allegation filed by the opponent and seeking for monetary sanctions. The Judge Chupp simply ignored all due process and clearly described in the statutory provisions of the TXCPRC, Chapter 10, Section 10.003 and 10.004(e) and issued one order to award monetary sanctions and without have abided with the statutory provisions and clearly described in the Chapter 10 of the TXCPRC, section 10.003 and section 10.004(e) and having violated clearly the due process and that any litigant has as constitutional right and in the statutory rights of the Chapter 10 of the TXCPRC.
·Anónimo·Litigant···
Smart, punctual, and reads the filings before hearings.
3.0
/ 5
Smart, punctual, and reads the filings before hearings. However, he makes up his mind quickly, won't change it, and chooses sides. Some judges come out on a side and can change their mind, giving you whiplash if you argued well. His hearings won't give you whiplash, you are just running into a brick wall. He is discourteous. This judge has been consistently rude at hearings and even made overt insults.
·Anónimo·Lawyer···
Does not take the time to understand the legal issues.
1.0
/ 5
Does not take the time to understand the legal issues. Unskilled in almost every respect. I call on my fellow republicans to remove him.
·Anónimo·Lawyer···
Lazy, doesn't really care about the truth, wants to get though the docket quickly and go home early.
2.0
/ 5
Lazy, doesn't really care about the truth, wants to get though the docket quickly and go home early. Condemned an innocent man because of paperwork pedantry.
·Anónimo·Legal Professional···
I have probably been in front of over 30-40 judges in 10 or more counties, and Judge Chupp is by far the worst.
1.0
/ 5
I have probably been in front of over 30-40 judges in 10 or more counties, and Judge Chupp is by far the worst. He had no idea what he was doing. Not sure if it is his normal demeanor or just his defensive nature due to his incompetence, but he just kept interrupting me, yelling, and attempting to belittle me in front of my clients. Then shut off the zoom hearing without letting me speak.
·Anónimo·Lawyer···
I do not feel like this judge spends the time to know about the case on hand.
2.0
/ 5
I do not feel like this judge spends the time to know about the case on hand. He came to court essentially uninformed of the case. He also shows partiality! Seems to me that an ignorance of the substance of the case isn't fair and just!
·Anónimo·Lawyer···
Does not read a single brief.
1.0
/ 5
Does not read a single brief. Will decide the outcome of every motion and case on the first words spoken by the plaintiff.