John S. Meyer

Judge Meyer should have retired long ago. He lost our brief and then told us he never received it although it was submitted to him 3 times. He sided with one side early on and never listened to any counter argument. He did not understand the law, did not read the law and ultimately acknowledged that he had rule incorrectly but by the time he figured it out it was too late to correct it. He is a terrible judge. Avoid him at all cost. He must be 90 now and should have retired at 70. He is lazy, does not listen to arguments or read the papers. he makes up his mind depending upon who he favors. If you are a woman lawyer bounce him the first chance you get. He hates women lawyers.

My dad herald Dean Thrweatt He's deceased now I'm his daughter Geneva mcgee I could not Pursue this Case until after 5 years. I never received any information about his settlement.from Hon.john S Meyer I would like to hear from you.

I am in disbelief that such an individual is allowed to be a judge. After some research it appears the reason this "judge" has his position on the bench is because he ran unopposed without competition (see ballotpedia.org) and thus won by default. That explains it. Our system should not allow for this to occur as it leads to poor quality candidates who lack experience and knowledge to handle the role and it leads to abuses of the legal process as there is no vetting or challenge and could be harmful to cases / decisions that have important implications.

Appearing in front of him shook my faith in our judicial system. I saw him act abusively towards attorneys that appeared before my case was called. During my case, he was closed-minded and demeaning. It was my worst experience ever in the courtroom. I will 170.6 him everytime going forward but hopefully he will just retire and stay retired

Utterly dumbfounded how a person of this low a caliber is able to find themselves in a judge's seat. The status quo of toxic men in this city's judiciary is third world corrupt. Judge Meyer is the most unprofessional judge I have had the displeasure of standing in front of. He clearly does not seem to either know or respect what an evidentiary is for, and a hearing set to take a day he insisted end in less than thirty minutes. An evidentiary hearing where the judge refuses to review evident, how novel. Demeaning to counsel, litigants and stooping to the lowest by calling parties "stupid" and obviously believes himself to be above his role. [redacted]

This Judge should not be on the bench. He does not serve the best interest of the people of San Diego well. He is rude, obnoxious, doesn't understand the law and takes pleasure in belittling people in his courtroom. He does not read papers and makes decisions from the hip. The Judicial Committee needs to review his decisions.

I have been in front of this judge 3 times.My Attorney is a friend of the plaintiffs attorney.My attorney never showed up for court.When I question Relph about her role in this Situation.She replied,attorneys do favors for each other all the time.I was never notified about the next 4 court dates.Judge Meyer told me not to talk.Set A date for trial.Last week when trail started.Mrs Chris Relph told Meyer,her client would not be here for two weeks.When I asked to speak he said no.He dosent like Mexican Jews. He's German.Hes going to burn me. other

Let's face it, most cases are simple and 95% of the time one party is off the reservation on the law. Judge has an intuitive sense of this reality and spends the energy where and when it is necessary. I like a judge with some Patton in him. Suck it up snowflakes!