Keli Michelle Aiken

She put children with an abusive parent and ordered than no one in the family associated with the other non abusive parent could call CPS if there was other abuse. If they did, the non abusive parent would lose custody. How does this make sense? If you have any child custody case come before her immediate try to get it moved to another judge.

Judge akins does not care about father's rights. My cousin is going through something right now and had to go before judge akin. Judge akin knows the mother of ex partner. This judge should have been recrused from this case. JJ can care less about fairness and family law. She has no business being in family law. My cousin doesn't stand a chance with this judge. And the ex partner, the mother and father and judge Aiken know this. Judge is ripping people apart, ripping families apart,ripping people from their children. This judge has no empathy or compassion when it comes to family law. Nor does she see the truth.

[Redacted by Ed.] She terminated parental rights on my son based on a sexual assault allegation that was clearly disproven. The DA office caught his accuser lying and the accuser's own OB/GYN said she was lying.However, the accusers mother is a former city council member and court appointed child advocate. How is this fair? Now we understand why my son's ex wife fought so hard to have the case moved from Judge Bench to Aikens court. We saw the Aiken and my son's mother in law hug each other at a meet the candidate forum. We should have moved to recuse Judge Aiken (more on that later). Judge Aiken never appointed an Attorney Ad Litem or Amicus Attorney to represent the best interests of the kids (required by law) and she never allowed my son to have a home study with him interacting with his kids for the custody evaluator (also required by law). Instead she puts a protective order on him banning him from having any contact with his kids for over 3 years and then at the end holds it against him that he had no contact for over 3 years. Back to the refusal. We appealed her decision to the 5th circuit and they agreed that Aiken showed bias and animosity against my son throughout the trialn but said that we should have objected and asked for refusal DURING the trial, not wait until after and appeal. We'll how we're we supposed to know she would make this immoral decision until she made it. [Redacted by Ed.]