Kelly P Butz

Circuit Court

PolkPolk10th Circuit
1.5/ 5

2 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.5
Impartiality1.5
Case preparation1.5
Case management1.5
Quality of rulings1.5
Treatment of counsel1.5
Empathy with parties1.5
Language & clarity1.5

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (2)

This judge is anything but honorable.

2.0
/ 5

This judge is anything but honorable. She signed an application for a search warrant, certifying that the officer provided probable cause and descriptions of the areas to be searched and what was being searched for, despite having seen none of those, because none existed. she approved an illegal warrant in bad faith, that had been filed in retaliation and bad faith, and was then executed in bad faith. David Rudd #8171 even openly admitted during the execution that the entire matter was initiated in response to a call from a homeless woman, whom he and another officer had arrested and sexually battered 3 months prior, inquiring about how to file a sexual battery complaint against an officer. he even congratulated her when she said as much, laughing while he said, "oh you figured it out!" a judge enabling this disgusting abuse of power and display of force is reprehensible, as Rudd MADE A POINT OF SEXUALLY BATTERING THE WOMAN ALL OVER AGAIN DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WARRANT, STICKING HIS HANDS DOWN HER PANTS JUST AS HE HAD 3 MONTHS PRIOR. He then proceeded to pry open the door of an rv on the property, and physically drag an unknown pregnant woman outside, zip tied her and confiscate her phone and cash, despite having the only person named on the warrant already in custody. the woman miscarried the following week.

AnónimoLegal Professional

She is a judge that does not care about what proof or facts you have on the other party in that particular case and ...

1.0
/ 5

She is a judge that does not care about what proof or facts you have on the other party in that particular case and does not even consider that a disabled child is involved only goes based on what the FLORIDA law says WoW never did I think that a judge would be ruling against the primary care giver to the child giving the other parent the rights to take everything nice job judge for having a an once of consideration way to go

AnónimoLawyer