After months of the judge and my ex rescheduling court and without allowing me to speak a single word, Maria S.Vasque...
1.0
/ 5
After months of the judge and my ex rescheduling court and without allowing me to speak a single word, Maria S.Vasquez-Doles vindicated my rapist. A man who hit me, threatened me, isolated me, stole from me, trashed my name, passed on diseases, and left me sobbing on the floor in a pool of my own blood and excrement. It has been almost 15 years and after 3 reconstructive procedures, I am still unable to use the restroom without a prolapse or bleeding. I was not allowed to even speak in her court room as she said “none of that matters”. I was devistated. As a victim of severe sexual/financial abuse, cruelty, and violence, I say she has no honor, care, or consideration. If you can get a different judge, do so for your own sanity. I wish you well.
·Anónimo·Lawyer···
From a decision I just got which speaks for itself.
1.0
/ 5
From a decision I just got which speaks for itself. Defendant contends that this court overlooked defendant’s argument that their storm in progress defense did not require defendant “to prove that the storm was continuous and unbroken prior to the accident, but rather, the storm can be intermittent.”...In support of both of their arguments, as to whether there was or was not a storm in progress at the time of the incident, plaintiff and defendant each submitted expert affidavits which produced different conclusions as to whether it was precipitating at the time of the incident and therefore if there was a storm in progress. In its decision, the Court noted that a triable issue of fact existed as to whether a storm was in progress at the time of the incident. This was on a motion to reargue.