Marisa Hernandez-Stern

Superior Court

CaliforniaLos AngelesCalifornia
3.0/ 5

3 reviews

Courtroom conduct3.0
Impartiality3.0
Case preparation3.0
Case management3.0
Quality of rulings3.0
Treatment of counsel3.0
Empathy with parties3.0
Language & clarity3.0

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (3)

Even prior to seeing the other comment saying the same, I too had planned on warning that she is a wolf in sheep's cl...

3.0
/ 5

Even prior to seeing the other comment saying the same, I too had planned on warning that she is a wolf in sheep's clothing. And that's what's so scary about her. Don't be fooled by the young innocent-looking face and the soft-spoken voice. That only LULLS you into thinking you've actually got a chance to win under her, only to then find out that it was just a set up for a letdown. She went from Dr. Jekyl to Mr. Hyde over the course of my appearances under her, and she ultimately gaslighted me to my face and ignored and disregarded my slam-dunk evidence against the landlord. It was almost as if she was consciously being apologetic to the landlord's attorney, making sure he and the other attorneys there watching, KNEW fullwell that at the end of the day, and as a new judge, that her loyalties clearly were aligned with the good ole boys club; I.e., the landlords and their attorneys...despite how nice she SEEMED to be towards the tenant in the beginning. Again...wolf in sheep's clothing...plus Jekyl and Hyde personality...and a blatant disregard of the evidence and the laws...you've been warned.

AnónimoLitigant

She’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

3.0
/ 5

She’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Her decisions are capricious, frivolous, and not based on law [Redacted by Ed.] She makes decisions by just saying “denied.” She is only here to protect the rich and powerful, [Redacted by Ed.] . Paper her and disqualify. She has no respect for the constitutional rights of the poor and less fortunate. She denied all due process.

AnónimoLitigant

Very prejudicing judge during my case, ignoring my constitutional rights abuses, she didn’t intentionally to promote ...

3.0
/ 5

Very prejudicing judge during my case, ignoring my constitutional rights abuses, she didn’t intentionally to promote fraud and misrepresentation, ex parte communications but the result was indeed unconstitutional ruling, maybe sometime she need to walk around the Los Angeles streets to see there output one of this they flooded with homeless people not all was legitimate complaints but a victim of constitutional rights abuses of state government especially defendant who can’t afford to pay or hire abusive and malpractice law firm and lastly maybe before she make any rulings she need to authenticate all documents including complaints and evidence to make sure fairness of the proceedings.

AnónimoLitigant