Mark S. Rammell

He granted a temporary guardianship when he stated after granting, that he had conflict of interest with the petitioners. He did not follow due diligence to investigate where/why the petitioners were seeking the guardianship. The parent was not properly served. He voluntarily resided from the case after the respondent parent filed declaration on conflict of interest “he described during the hearing that he was family friend” of the petitioner. But the order granted by him was not voided and the Idaho court’s new judge took on the case and did not address their mistake. The GAL he appointed were Facebook and church ward friend of the petitioners. The judge, GAL, the petitioners were all the members of the LDS.

He granted a temporary guardianship when he stated after granting, that he had conflict of interest with the petitioners. He did not follow due diligence to investigate where/why the petitioners were seeking the guardianship. The parent was not properly served. He voluntarily resided from the case after the respondent parent filed declaration on conflict of interest “he described during the hearing that he was family friend” of the petitioner. But the order granted by him was not voided and the Idaho court’s new judge took on the case and did not address their mistake. The GAL he appointed were Facebook and church ward friend of the petitioners. The judge, GAL, the petitioners were all the members of the LDS.

He granted a temporary guardianship when he stated after granting, that he had conflict of interest with the petitioners. He did not follow due diligence to investigate where/why the petitioners were seeking the guardianship. The parent was not properly served. He voluntarily resided from the case after the respondent parent filed declaration on conflict of interest “he described during the hearing that he was family friend” of the petitioner. But the order granted by him was not voided and the Idaho court’s new judge took on the case and did not address their mistake. The GAL he appointed were Facebook and church ward friend of the petitioners. The judge, GAL, the petitioners were all the members of the LDS.