Stunningly inept.
3.0
/ 5
Stunningly inept. Hard to believe he's actually looking at the same case. Decisions reads more like he knew what he wanted to do, and is trying to construct a set of facts to justify an unreasonable conclusion. Unfortunately when he relies on misrepresentation of facts rather than law he can get away with it. He knows on appeal they aren't checking the facts.
AnónimoLitigant