Nancy J. Koppe

Magistrate

NevadaNevada District Court9th Circuit
2.7/ 5

6 reviews

Courtroom conduct2.7
Impartiality2.7
Case preparation2.7
Case management2.7
Quality of rulings2.7
Treatment of counsel2.7
Empathy with parties2.7
Language & clarity2.7
Have you had an experience with this judge? Leave your review

Reviews (6)

Civil Litigation - Private: Probably the worst judge I've ever come across. She seems to delight in…

1.0
/ 5

Probably the worst judge I've ever come across. She seems to delight in her own partiality in cases, often going out of her way to punish attorneys who she thinks disagree with her. She avoids hearings at all costs, which prevents the creation of a record, and then fails to provide sufficient explanation for her rulings.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: Judge Koppe is the very best that the Federal Judiciary has to offer.…

5.0
/ 5

Judge Koppe is the very best that the Federal Judiciary has to offer. She rules quickly. She makes well-reasoned decisions. She ensure that justice is carried out. Also, she has a fantastic sense of humor.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: The best. This judge is well-respected in the legal community. She…

5.0
/ 5

The best. This judge is well-respected in the legal community. She makes fair and discerning rulings. The bench needs more like her.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: Unlike Magistrate Johnston, she does not hold hearings in court and…

2.0
/ 5

Unlike Magistrate Johnston, she does not hold hearings in court and develop the record and clarify issues and arguments. She was so biased in favor of the corporate defendant that her rulings on discovery issues were almost incomprehensible.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: This judge is ridiculous. She uses improper language and tone to…

1.0
/ 5

This judge is ridiculous. She uses improper language and tone to chastise lawyers in her orders, and it is clear that she does not rule impartially. She needs to be removed from the bench.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: This judge is rude, very prejudicial, and rules on orders without…

2.0
/ 5

This judge is rude, very prejudicial, and rules on orders without granting oral arguments a majority of the time. I'm still trying to figure out how she got the nomination to replace Judge Johnston. She is a disgrace to the Federal bench!

Anónimo