Pamela M. Parker

Worst judge ever, you need to watchout for her communicating with OC and/or MC if she has one on your case.

Just about the worst and most destructive family court judge on the bench in Southern California. She enjoys hurting men.

Has anyone ever made decisions when raging and fuming? It’s almost always the worst unwise and completely wrong decision. Parker is perpetually and constantly raging and fuming. How can she possibly make wise decisions and judgements? It’s impossible. She has a long history of the most damaging judgement to families, yet she is tolerated because of Title 4D federal child support incentivization for the state. She is very stupid. She doesn’t understand the consequences, even to herself. She will be taken her off the bench one way or another.

Something very strange and disturbing about this judge which should be the only reason needed to remove her from the bench by force. I continue replaying the scene in my head hoping that I’m wrong, but no matter how I dissect it, I come to the same conclusion. I still hope I am wrong on it, but I’m not. This judge will purposely end the session midway if the male in the divorce case is on the stand and is having a very poised and composed day. She actually tries to reschedule the session hoping the male will have a day where he is emotional and angry at being ruined in a divorce. Of course, if you had poor sleep and other stressors before the rescheduled date, you are at greater chance of being irritable and upset during re-testifying on the stand. It’s only natural. What is disturbing is that this judge tries to prolong the stress and promote interim events that will create a mental state for you to be irritable and upset so she can crucify you on her rulings. I’m hoping I am wrong on my assessment and I’m just being unreasonably negative about her. But I just don’t think I am. This is just extremely unethical and plain evil on her behalf. Get this awful person off the bench. Something is seriously wrong with her character and personality.

If you want to find out the definition of toxic femininity, open up a dictionary and you will see a portrait/picture of a raging angry Pamela Parker next to it. Also, as requested, I didn't want this comment to go down: “The crown jewel of her foolishness is the Diana Lovejoy case. And Parker’s name has been meticulously kept from being known eventhough she ruled on her behalf a dozen times. Check out who Diana Lovejoy is on YouTube.” View Detail

` This judge is the de facto reason why no man should ever be legally married in California. She is the worst of the worst. And the rest of these man hating lunatic judges are not far behind her. Brothers, do not get married in the west, EVER, unless you have something other than children to gain from women, never marry them legally. Treat women just like they treat you in marriage and the divorce industry. It’s business!!!

Raging lunatic irrational illogical pseudo-feminist who has zero knowledge of cluster B narcissists and sociopathic personality disorder. She is an absolute disaster on the bench. She has deep seated hate and animosity for males which has blossomed into a jagged thorny dark tree. She was able to hide this disdain years ago, but it has become far more difficult to keep that mask on. If you are intelligent and you have life experience, Just looking at this angry raging crazy woman and listening to her first few words coming out of her mouth, you will realize what you are facing. Recuse this foolish misandrist with CCP 170.6 ten days before you step in front of her. You have zero chance as a male in front of her. She has a world of pain heading her way due to her behavior. Accountability is heading towards this shrew.

To the wonderful people of california, keep voting for extreme left wing policies and you will continue getting this lunatic femin*zi and family hating degenerate gender confused morons on the bench as your judges who will tear apart your families. Also, I didn't want this comment to go down as requested: “The crown jewel of her foolishness is the Diana Lovejoy case. And Parker’s name has been meticulously kept from being known eventhough she ruled on her behalf a dozen times. Check out who Diana Lovejoy is on YouTube.”

I thought this comment should be repeated and brought to the top. Don’t let this comment go down. This is the most important comment that defines this judges presence on the bench. “The crown jewel of her foolishness is the Diana Lovejoy case. And Parker’s name has been meticulously kept from being known eventhough she ruled on her behalf a dozen times. Check out who Diana Lovejoy is on YouTube.”

Sorry I meant comment 55756, not 55757 Still laughing though!!!

. At comment #55757…….LOLLLLLL is that you Pamela? Or is it some of your incentivized goons? Literally everything this commentator has said is exactly the opposite. I keep laughing at this commentators sentences. Keep up the comedy gold!!! Parker is the most unwise and damaging judge on the bench. I don’t know how she became a judge. It seems it’s solely a political appointment than based on merit, talent and skill. I can’t wait until the damage these idiots do to families comes to fruition in California. Hope you guys are ready!!!

I recently had the privilege of litigating a case before Judge Parker. We are lucky to have someone with her abilities on the bench. Her approach to seeking the truth is both thorough and fair. It's hard not to respect the way she provides her analysis for reaching a judgment. It's clear and makes sense for anyone to understand. I really got the sense that this is how a judge should be.

The crown jewel of her foolishness is the Diana Lovejoy case. And Parker’s name has been meticulously kept from being known eventhough she ruled on her behalf a dozen types. Check out who Diana Lovejoy is on YouTube.

This foolish woke judge is having an awful time, specially now that Trump won. You are gonna see her take her anger and hate out on men in her court far worse than before. What a miserable wretch!!!

I read comment CA54905 and the commentator did not elaborate on how this Judges Ruling benefits the salary of the judges and the budget of the state. I hope I am right on this, I have researched this in detail nd the commentator is likely referring to Title 4D of the social security act that incentivizes giving the children to the lower income earner parent to maximize child support transfer, of which amount the federal government matches 60% of every dollar that changes hands by giving that fraction to the state government. for example: if one parent pays the other parent 1000 dollars a month for child support. The federal government, through the social security act of 1964 Title 4D rulings, gives 600 dollars to the state treasury which then finances the judge's salaries and their retirement. It's institutionalized corruption. This is why the overwhelming majority of judges give custody to the women, who are usually the lower income earners, so they can maximize the federal fund collection to the state. But in terms of Parker, she has taken it beyond rational and reason, she gives overwhelming custody to female criminals even after the females have confessed to several felonies on the stand in her presence and have been caught fabricating evidence to play abuse victim in order to win the battle of divorce. This doesn't excuse Parker's hate for men. She despises men, but her hate is utilized by the system to destroy men's lives and have the system and the judges profit from it.

“When masculine republics change to feminine democracies, the natural progression of feminine democracies lead to tyranny”…..Aristotle We have abandoned the age of reason and are in the era of feelings. Pamela Parker is a prime example of abandoning hard cold facts in favor of ideology and feeling which are really toxic radical wokism.

This woman does not rule in the best interest of the children. She rules based on sociopolitical association and financial benefit of the system which benefits the salaries of the judges. You may ask how? She is a raging woke liberal that will rule against the white dominant heterosexual male fathers no matter what kind of psychopath the female mother is proven to be. And I’m talking hard evidence of criminal behavior confessed on the stand and 100% irrefutable child abuse and parental alienation. She actually enjoys hurting men, I have see her smile with an evil smirk thinking her victims can not get back at her. That maybe true, but you can’t deny karmic law. That always finds you. Just look at her overwhelming misery and unhappiness, this is only a part of the karma.

.. OMG!!! Out of more than 2000 judges ranked on the Robing Room, Pamela Parker has BY FAR the most reviews at 331 with 98% being atrociously negative. The next judge is Judge Towery at 143, and the next judge after that comes in at 77. And there are a few in the 50s. Then the rest are between 0 and 20. Goes to show you even Harvard churns out useless damaging graduates from time to time Think about that for a second!!! Parker has the most detailed reviews and the highest absolute percentage of negative reviews on this site. How is this raging pseudo feminist fool tolerated by the people of California. What the heck is wrong with California???

This judge lacks the central quality needed for sound judgement. And that quality is wisdom. The profound lack of wisdom in her personality and character have caused significant problems in people’s lives. But no one cares because she is bringing in money for the system. Someone whom she has caused severe problems for will eventually get back at her in a legal and most devastating way. You can not fight the laws of nature by nonsense rulings. Nature will always find you.

Have you guys read the daily journal on Parker? Family court judges almost always rotate out of family court after 3 years. Yet Pamela has stayed in family court for more than 10 years. Mind you, in terms of judicial profession, ask any judge and any lawyer, family court is the bottom of the barrel. Almost all judges start there and climb up the ladder. This is a known fact inside the legal community. Ask lawyers and judges in private and they will tell you this. Yet Parker is saying on the article “why would I leave family court after 10 years when I’m finally getting comfortable and good at it and I know the lawyers”. No pamela, you CANT get out of family court. You can’t get out of the bottom of the barrel. Pamela has zero judicial talent and has an awful man hating personality on top of it. That’s the real reason she can’t climb out of family court. She is awful at her job and has destroyed countless lives. People have noticed this and don’t want her ascending in rank in the judicial professions. Everybody knows she is awful. But it’s politically incorrect at this point in American history to talk against a disturbed raging pseudo-feminist. However, people are getting sick and tired of this woke nonsense and there the pendulum is swinging back. She is only tolerated by the powers that be because makes money for the state and ancillary services through her rulings due to the 1964 social security act. Go read the bottom reviews child support incentivization and you will understand.