Peter Darvin

Judge Darvin had pre-determined conceptions that appear to have significantly influenced his decision in a contentious divorce case. One party told lie after lie after lie. Those lies were exposed by expert testimony, but Judge Darvin gave the lies equal or greater weight to the expert testimony. He bought into the lies hook, line, and sinker.

Judge Darvin leans very heavily on the scales of justice by cherry-picking which witnesses may testify about what. He is mainly interested in collecting select evidence that only supports his pre-trial opinion. The school-to-jail pipeline starts in his courtroom.