Peter R. Lopez

Circuit Court

Miami-DadeMiami-Dade11th Circuit
2.9/ 5

8 reviews

Courtroom conduct2.9
Impartiality2.9
Case preparation2.9
Case management2.9
Quality of rulings2.9
Treatment of counsel2.9
Empathy with parties2.9
Language & clarity2.9

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (8)

A hack, intellectually dishonest and zero desire to do justice, plus he let's his JA run his chambers like it's her p...

1.0
/ 5

A hack, intellectually dishonest and zero desire to do justice, plus he let's his JA run his chambers like it's her personal fifedom, he needs to retire and let a more energetic jurist take his place.

AnónimoLawyer

Smug and peremptory, he fancies himself a legal scholar but is nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is.

1.0
/ 5

Smug and peremptory, he fancies himself a legal scholar but is nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. At the first hearing in the case I knew I would be appealing. He's held the same judgeship for decades and is probably disillusioned. Eager to clear his docket.

AnónimoLitigant

Something strange going on here.

4.0
/ 5

Something strange going on here. I made one comment about Judge Lopez and came back due to curiosity to find that my script about my experience with Judge Lopez was trifled with and what I had said had been mixed around and about but most certainly contrived into similiar remarks (comments) that most certainly meant to mimic mine, different yet the same and that's not fair to the Judge even though I don't patricianly like him, no I don't respect him at all.

AnónimoLawyer

Judge Lopez could have done better!

3.0
/ 5

Judge Lopez could have done better!

AnónimoLawyer

Not bad considering it could be worse.

4.0
/ 5

Not bad considering it could be worse.

AnónimoLitigant

Prejudicial prejudice to this female pro se litigant, fearful of eye contact, smirks & stacks papers already stacked,...

4.0
/ 5

Prejudicial prejudice to this female pro se litigant, fearful of eye contact, smirks & stacks papers already stacked, ignored objections, refused 4-written recusals, asking a Defendant, "What are you doing here? She replied "I'm a Defendant" Lopez stacks papers again. Lopez's arrogant smirk was at his core untruthful & fearful, a helpful liar for billionaire Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs attorney against an 82-and-65-year-olds. Even if these folks win, they'll still be losers collectively because this one required a bum for a lawyer, a bum for the Plaintiffs and a bum for a judge to pull this one off

AnónimoLitigant

In our particular case the judge seemed arrogant to openly hostile and uncaring even a touch of arrogance and anger a...

2.0
/ 5

In our particular case the judge seemed arrogant to openly hostile and uncaring even a touch of arrogance and anger as could care less, openly prejudiced against pro se litigants. We knew in a second we'd be appealing whatever his character might dish out a year or two down the road.

AnónimoLawyer

This judge moonlights as a law professor at St.

4.0
/ 5

This judge moonlights as a law professor at St. Thomas University. He is easily intimidates even by self-represented litigants yet bullies when he believes he can without any repercussion. He has tried to get appointed to higher court, but apparently lacks the connections. Bad judge!!!

AnónimoLitigant