Reemberto Diaz

I use to thickly highly of Judge Diaz when I covered motion calendar hearings pre-pandemic for my former employer. At that time Judge Diaz was no nonsense. However since then I have had several lawsuits I’m litigating before him. His coziness with opposing counsel became evident when he was quite chatty, acknowledged what was filed and denied relief that was clearly in my client’s favor. While he can be very pleasant and cordial watch out if he knows the opposing party and anyone involved because he has unconscious bias and will rule against you wrongfully when the law does not support his ruling. Have a court reporter at all times as you may need to appeal. Also read the comments when the Judge was in the family division. I have only encountered this Judge in the civil division. [Redacted by Ed.].

This guy cost innocent people MILLIONS OF DOLLARS when he ruled in favor of Raging Bull LLC during a TRO hearing. Thankfully the FTC launched a lawsuit against Raging Bull a few years later but... Reemberto Diaz sides with frauds and seems to be partial for Attorneys and against pro se litigants. Again, his actions cost innocent people MILLIONS. He is also unnecessarily rude to all litigants.

This judge is absolutely out of order. He adores child abusers and child predators. He does not fight for the Kids. He only fights for men who abuse children. Refuse to go over evidence and does not allow women to speak no matter how long strong her evidence is!!! Forced me to enter a time sharing order even if the guy doesnt ever comply or see the children. Him and lawyer rick wants to force you to pay them especially if you are a struggling single mom even if your case is easily proven!!! Violate childrens and mothers rights and allows men to get away with it by doing less and paying less!!! Unbelievable.

I am not saying this Judge is a 10 because he always agreed with what I wanted to made judgments in my favor. I am commenting based on the fairness he provided and actually reviewed the evidence, heard testimony, and based his judgements on law rather than personal opinions. He also was patient enough to explain.