I've seen Judge Naftz make too many bad evidentiary and procedural decisions to trust him to get things right.
I've seen Judge Naftz make too many bad evidentiary and procedural decisions to trust him to get things right. I have had him question my ability to get certain documents into evidence while in open court, in front of a jury before any attempt to lay foundation was made. I have seen him admit full blown ballistic forensics as lay-witness testimony in trial. He has given advice to the state's prosecutors about how to get certain testimony into evidence whilst in the middle of trial, with the witness and jury still seated. Against a criminal defense attorney, he will use deadlines to deny the opportunity to file motions to suppress while simultaneously hand waving away the State's failure to meet their deadlines and obligations. He is bar none my least favorite judge to have hear pre-trial motions. I just don't trust my client will get a fair shot. Other judges I may disagree with, but at least I will believe that they considered the issue.