Ronald F. Frazier

This judge operates on a completely different level of collusion with the attorneys.  He seems mild mannered but he is extremely vindictive and passive aggressive. You'll hear him say "Educate me" in court and he is more than willing to engage in chambers communications without a reporter.  [Redacted by Ed.] Once he is properly "educated" he will take your case with him wherever he goes.  Needless to say he cares nothing about the law.  He will manipulate the docket and the rulings, depending on the "education" he gets.  He will nunc pro tunc his orders and go back in time to change things.  He does not care about case law, civil procedure, court rules or the appearance of impropriety.  He gets embroiled in cases and manipulates the law to achieve his goals or speaking from both sides of his mouth in his conflicting rulings.  His rulings are internally inconsistent!    He got himself a personal department where he takes his "Educate me" cases for special attention to finish the job.  This judge needs to be investigated by the CJP or DA [Redacted by Ed.].  If you get this judge, peremptory challenge him.  But if [Redacted by Ed.] , you're out of luck because the opposing counsel will be in first and he will deny your 170.6. If your case involves any kind of real estate with equity, you will never be able to  get rid of him, because his education depends on the value of the property, not the value of the case.  Other than that, pretty charming dude sitting on a very expensive throne.

I find similar with the 4/3/21 review. I was In Pro Per. I quoted Milligan v. City of Laguna Beach as the exact same incident occurred to me with the same type of tree, a city tree, falling on my home the city of Encinitas knew of before and Judge Frazier granted immunity abusing discretion. I did a bad job of arguing my case, but my filing was good enough to show the city should have been responsible for the damage as they neglected to maintain the tree they knew about before. This judge refused to tell me his basis of decision even though I asked. Told me I had to get an attorney to explain it to me. Not True! He was the judge making the ruling. Either you do or don't have basis. BIAS FOR SURE FROM FRAZIER! Judges should all be to further understanding of law. They are our public servants and in my opinion, they should be held to an extreme standard of duty to us all. I know it's a tough job, but hey, the courts do not make it a level field for Pro Per filings. We have no choice in many cases as attorneys won't defend our rights.