Samuel T. McAdam

Very bias judge. He should not be sitting as a judge.

The judge's decision in my case seemed to overlook critical facts. Despite evidence suggesting the defendant was wrongfully dismissed, the judge ruled that I must cover their attorney's fees. Moreover, the case was suspended for all matters unrelated to the dismissed defendant, pending an appeal that concerned only this defendant. When I highlighted the lack of a clear Operating Agreement to justify such fees, the judge did not even request a response from the opposing side. Instead, he hastily concluded that the case should not be reconsidered. When I further pressed on the Operating Agreement issue, I was abruptly removed from the courtroom session. While the judge may have displayed fairness in other cases, his impartiality appears questionable when it involves a female minority representing herself against a powerful billionaire group.