Saundra B. Armstrong

District

CaliforniaCalifornia Northern District Court9th Circuit
2.5/ 5

6 reviews

Courtroom conduct2.5
Impartiality2.5
Case preparation2.5
Case management2.5
Quality of rulings2.5
Treatment of counsel2.5
Empathy with parties2.5
Language & clarity2.5
Have you had an experience with this judge? Leave your review

Reviews (6)

Criminal Defense Lawyer: I thought they were supposed to have standards for appointing federal…

1.0
/ 5

I thought they were supposed to have standards for appointing federal judges. How this judge got her job, God only knows.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: I do complex commercial litigation and I've gotten good, very…

4.0
/ 5

I do complex commercial litigation and I've gotten good, very well-reasoned opinions from her. Also rules relatively promptly - my impression is that she works HARD.

Anónimo

Criminal Defense Lawyer: Her 2.9 rating says it all. Stupid and opinionated. She is a former cop…

3.0
/ 5

Her 2.9 rating says it all. Stupid and opinionated. She is a former cop and behaves as if she were still busting heads on the street. The lawyer just below who rated her as a 3 is right on. In case you can't figure out why she's a judge, it is called affirmative action and yes we do have wonderful magistrate judges in the NDCA.

Anónimo

Criminal Defense Lawyer: Government-oriented and not particularly bright, one wonders why Judge…

2.0
/ 5

Government-oriented and not particularly bright, one wonders why Judge Armstrong was appointed district judge, instead of elevating one of the pool of talented magistrates the Northern District has.

Anónimo

Civil Litigation - Private: She is always prepared. Lawyers who appear in her court on time and…

3.0
/ 5

She is always prepared. Lawyers who appear in her court on time and prepared will have no problem. Professional comportment is also a stickler with her.

Anónimo

Criminal Defense Lawyer: Very pro-defense in civil rights cases.

2.0
/ 5

Very pro-defense in civil rights cases.

Anónimo