Suzanne Parisien

Superior Court

WashingtonKingWashington
1.0/ 5

9 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.0
Impartiality1.0
Case preparation1.0
Case management1.0
Quality of rulings1.0
Treatment of counsel1.0
Empathy with parties1.0
Language & clarity1.0

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (9)

A very biased judge who is woefully neglectful of her role as an impartial judge.

1.0
/ 5

A very biased judge who is woefully neglectful of her role as an impartial judge. Tramples on basic rights of defendant while voiding her oath of office.

AnónimoLawyer

Unconstitutional, biased, unqualified judge

1.0
/ 5

Unconstitutional, biased, unqualified judge

AnónimoLegal Professional

She’s a disgrace to the legal profession.

1.0
/ 5

She’s a disgrace to the legal profession. Malicious, erratic, sociopathic, and incompetent. Doesn’t read a word of pleadings or listen. How many of her biased rulings need to be overturned before the judiciary pays attention. She’s caused real psychic damage to women in particular who she treats poorly and decides against while leaving them saddled with huge debt for lawyer fees. Shame on her and Washington State.

AnónimoLawyer

This Judge is objectively terrible and does not belong on the bench as many of my colleagues agree.

1.0
/ 5

This Judge is objectively terrible and does not belong on the bench as many of my colleagues agree. She is biased and lazy, clearly conducting no legal research or even reading the attorney’s submissions. Her lack of substantive legal knowledge is evident in her rulings and one wonders if she is even minimally qualified to be a judge. A disgrace in every way.

AnónimoLawyer

I do not think she read the files .

1.0
/ 5

I do not think she read the files . Issues a summary judgement in a week with zero written analysis. Dismissed the fact that the defendant missed the timeline to file the motion . Refused to delay the hearing when we could not locate a key witness for deposition , but that same witness gave a declaration for the defense . Outrageous . Her demeanor is flippant . She needs to be removed .

AnónimoLitigant

It is unfathomable how such a morally depraved individual could be appointed a judge.

1.0
/ 5

It is unfathomable how such a morally depraved individual could be appointed a judge. She gifts judgments based on her personal whim and fancy, without any regard whatsoever for law or facts. Should be in jail for self dealing and criminal abuse of power but the immunity farce goes on.

AnónimoLawyer

A pure psycho.

1.0
/ 5

A pure psycho. Should be admitted in a mental institution. Shows complete disdain for the constitution and the laws, as she makes it clear she runs her court according to the laws she makes up on the fly as she deems fit, and scorns at the statutes made by the public representatives in a democracy. She runs the Court as her own fiefdom knowing the Court of Appeals is a big joke.

AnónimoLawyer

Terrible judge.

1.0
/ 5

Terrible judge. Violate state laws in court room and is racist by all means. Just a neutral review of her ruling will and decisions will show who she is. Some one should take legal action to remove her from superior court.

AnónimoLegal Professional

Terrible Judge and terrible person.

1.0
/ 5

Terrible Judge and terrible person. She neglected then abandoned her elderly father with end stage Alzheimer's disease and cancer because his money ran out and she wasn't getting an inheritance.

AnónimoLawyer