I personally had my custody case under Judge Schillari.
I personally had my custody case under Judge Schillari. She is a good judge but is not versed in child psychological abuse via a shared persecutory delusion. 95% of the custody cases where the parents are in continuous conflict one of the parents has a personality disorder driving the conflict/delusion which parenting coordinators are unable to handle along with 95% of the family therapist who have never diagnosed a shared delusion or factitious attachment disorder imposed on a child. Hopefully Judge Schillari starts using AI along with the attorneys, so they get a differential diagnosis on which parent is causing the attachment pathology. HER E IS AI RESPONSE which gathers the applicable and acceptable knowledge: shared persecutory delusion in the family court how to diagnose and who can diagnose Shared persecutory delusion, also known as folie à deux or shared psychotic disorder, is a rare psychiatric condition where a delusion (a fixed, false belief not amenable to change in light of conflicting evidence) is transmitted from one person (the "inducer" or "primary case") to another individual or individuals who are in a close relationship (the "induced" or "secondary case"). In the context of family court, this often arises when one parent develops a persecutory delusion about the other parent, and then the child or children adopt this delusion. How to Diagnose Shared Persecutory Delusion Diagnosing shared persecutory delusion, especially in a family court context, is complex and requires a thorough psychiatric evaluation. Here's a breakdown of the diagnostic process and key considerations: Clinical History and Observation: Presence of a primary case: There must be an individual with an established delusion (the "inducer"). This person is usually dominant in the relationship and gradually imposes their delusional system on the more passive, initially healthy second person. Close relationship: The individuals involved (e.g., parent and child) must be