Tracey Westerhausen

she dose not follow the law, she will cite the law on her order then say she has the power to override the law to cause harm during the divorce process, she will inflate wages that do not exist to award spousal support, and refuse to correct the unsupported award, She will request post-petition income and use that income for spousal support while knowing she has no right to do so, and when questioned what exhibit was used to support the order she will dismiss your request for conclusion of facts and laws to support her ruling. she will turn debts into assets/offsets if there are not enough offsets to keep one spouse from paying any debts.

She does not follow the law when it comes to family court. One of the parties in a family court case was told to submit a motion for attorney fees when the other party was found to be unreasonable by Tracy herself. She ended up ruling in favor of the respondent because she wanted the petitioner to wait until trial. The petitioner asked for respondent to be sanctioned after omitting pertinent evidence to the case. She unfairly ruled against petitioner and prevented him from submitting anything during trial. Thus, by default the respondent won because the other party could not afford a trial he had a good chance of losing. Petitioner was able to financially abuse the other party by extending the trial for 2 years. Custody and legal decision making were taken away from a father trying to be in his autistic sons life when he had raised him for 10 years.

She was my attorney in 2013 and gave me up to the prosecution. She took $25k and after my sentence told me that she "had to give me up to the prosecutor" so that he would deal with other clients. When asked to show a record of her work, she refused to show any documentation. She was nice up front, but did absolutely nothing for my case.

Her #1 priority is resolution. Fairness matters little. Close scrutiny of issues won't happen. She's all about getting these family matters resolved quickly.

Negligent. Overlooks key facts and loses the point. Allowed multiple violations of proceedings, thus creating injustice and unequal treatment of both parties in the court room. Given the fact she is currently in family court, her lack of professionalism, tardiness, serving injustice, not justice, hurt the most vulnerable parties - children.