I have experience with this judge in only one criminal trial.
I have experience with this judge in only one criminal trial. In this matter, the claim by the accuser was unprecedented. The deciding evidence at trial was one or two of the defendant's answers to questions in English, her second language without evidence that she was proficient in it and without a translator or legal assistance. Her defense attorneys failed to rebut a single claim. failed to use fact and expert witnesses and presented none of an abundance of exculpatory evidence. She should have known the trial was biased and unfair. To make matters worse, the elderly immigrant would not apologize for acts she claims she did not do and was sentenced for 25 years, despite an abundance of data indicating her probability of recidivism (assuming she had committed the far-fetched acts) was zero.