William Alsup

District Court

CaliforniaCalifornia Northern District Court9th Circuit
1.4/ 5

10 reviews

Courtroom conduct1.4
Impartiality1.4
Case preparation1.4
Case management1.4
Quality of rulings1.4
Treatment of counsel1.4
Empathy with parties1.4
Language & clarity1.4

Get notified when a new review is published

Have you had an experience with this judge? Review and get your reward

Reviews (10)

8 years, 8 years ago I first appeared before this Individual Creton with Power.

1.0
/ 5

8 years, 8 years ago I first appeared before this Individual Creton with Power. I have been patient as Job, but [redacted by Ed.]. $160 Million securities fraud on 14 people, the largest fraud ever filed on Ca's central coast re INTELL PROPERTIES I HELPED develop in my homes, USED IN THE I PHONE RE DIGIT ADVERT, 14 founders/IP Developers filed in a county court, that couldn't afford to litigate the matter, all of us never had a single day in court. Instead, I was before the Creton singularly to void the state judgment for fraud on the court, first entering courts alone, and he wrote false orders from day one, gleefully; misquoted a record that did not in fact exist, ignored corporate officials attested documents in my favor proving my claims, proceeded to prosecute me by NEVER allowing me subpoena power. Despite my win of a CA demurrer and discovery order, that he and the other state "actors" have sought to destroy the history of that little uncomfortable fact by covering and concealing it by refusing to ever, even once address that matter; Alsup, for his D cronies in the state courts, instead of doing his FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES, ditch the Amendments and set about making sure I was being cheated further of my Federal protections, i.e. the FACT OF my orig judge retiring and the replacement CA "judge" being appointed to the bench against me by...wait for it..."DEFENDANTS BUSINESS PARTNER" yep! Def's OWNED at the time,,,100% of the ENTIRE TERMINATE"HER" movie franchise..... ALSUP, like the DEF replacement, never allowed me SUBPOENA POWERS as the US SUPREME COURT has instructed to get to the "merits" of a pro se's matter BEFORE DISMISSING CLAIMS "procedurally"; Instead, for the state cronies; HE PROSECUTED ME WITH GLEE as a perjurer upholding a criminal CA granted million dollar judgment PUSHED By TEN non percipient "OFF I C(H)ERS " of Court, with NOT ONE DEF OR CORPORATE COUNSEL,ever IN YEARS attesting the FORGERY OR ANY SECONDARY EVIDENCE OF IT!! a fake lawsuit, fake "$50K Supposed SETTLEMENT" CON tract that he refuses anyone to show him evidence of !! All he does is allow them to LIE WITH only a FRAUD EXHIBIT corp counsel emailed me THAT I CALLED A FRAUD From day one!! NO EVIDENCE under ANY FED OR CA CODE and he WONT MAKE THEM SHOW INK!! HE AND ALL THE OTHER "JUDGES" CANT MAKE ONE EVIDENTIARY CODE CA, or FED RULING, I AM NOW EXISTING in a vehicle because of a FEDERAL JUDGE sadistically pushing a FORGERY still on my head by the dirty, 10 FRAUD LITIGATIONS HEDGE FUND. 10 fraud litigations that they lost, lawsuits with people they owed fiduciary duties to. A FEDERAL JUDGE UPHOLDING FRAUDSTERS THAT IN FACT WERE FOUND guilty of "willful, deliberate 17 thousand pages of accounting evidence destruction, DURING COURT PROCEEDINGS"; now that the truth is surfacing about these high ca state politicians and national politicians involvement in this matter FOR YEARS, including ATTEMPTING TO OVERTURN A CA 40 YEAR MERGER LAW THAT PROTECTED OUR CL

AnónimoLitigant

Hopelessly out of touch with anyone but himself.

1.0
/ 5

Hopelessly out of touch with anyone but himself. Will babble on for 5 minutes on the record if someone coughs, sneezes or clears their throat in his courtroom. He chastised a fairly young hardworking female attorney for "looking unwell" and coughing in his courtroom. A nut case.

AnónimoLegal Professional

Please do a search on this San Diego Law Review, Volume 1, Issue 1 (1964) on "findings of fact" for FRCP 54(c) and 15...

2.0
/ 5

Please do a search on this San Diego Law Review, Volume 1, Issue 1 (1964) on "findings of fact" for FRCP 54(c) and 15(b) - in connection with FRCP 8(c)(1) for a falsified "affirmative defenses" under the long list therefor. This article explained the duty of district judges. The gaping loophole created by the one-sided plausibility pleading for ALL cases under Ashcroft v. Iqbal can be exploited by fraudsters that plaintiff cannot know or respond. But the fraudulent scheme will also void 28 U.S.C. §1331 and §1291 -- meaning "appellate jurisdiction" for "mandamus" under Article III of the Constitution cannot compel the lower courts to respond in absence of jurisdiction. Only DOJ has the Constitutional authority to take over and enforce a federal law. Cf. 28 U.S.C. §2072(b), when a judge also exploits the procedural due process. DOJ has the "duty" under 28 U.S.C. §547 to enforce a federal law. Marbury v. Madison jurisprudence should be used to support the DOJ duty (and that of the states). Legal community (judges included) should be aware of the epic harm on the judicial system from the combination. I went through hell (even with a legal team for the class action) in the last 13+ years. Contact me if you want.

AnónimoLitigant

Brady Material is evidence helpful to a person accused of a crime.

1.0
/ 5

Brady Material is evidence helpful to a person accused of a crime. Prosecution lost Brady Material in criminal trial against me. Alsup denied my motion seeking the Brady material. I believe that every party seeking justice should avoid appearing before alsup.

AnónimoLawyer

Today, the 9th Upheld this man's slanderous, life defining destruction order upon me.

2.0
/ 5

Today, the 9th Upheld this man's slanderous, life defining destruction order upon me. I will never get over this, ever. This man, cut and paste the Def's slanderous allegations in their dismissal motions and then committed his own full fledged assault on my character and person. He told me I had a "Victim Complex"....that I had a "habit" of "always being the victim". The facts, etched in stone of numerous dockets around the State of CA is the following; I helped develop IP that is used in and of support of the IPHONE, that was created in my own home, leased in my name, for years. For this, I was promised a small %. Years after that promise, I had to hire counsel to have the % in fact "formalized", which occurred within a 45 minute court session with no arguments, everyone involved knew the % was mine. Next up! Within DAYS: Enter the Vulture, the thieving kind, tied to the hip of Judges, District Attorneys, City Attorneys, State SEnators heading up "Judiciary Committees" you name it, they have it! The vultures weren't about to have a trained accountant that might ask to look at books and records at any point in time of their scheme to steal the IP of myself and my co founders, like they had done across the state to many other family owned business' with valuable IP's; the Vultures set about lying to Courts, extorting the founders and myself for signatures to move securities representing our valuable, $165M intell properties over a 8 year period. The day the I Phone was announced to the WORLD I was ambushed, no attorney, with a witness, I went to pick up 5-6 replacement stock certificates for the 5-6 replacement stock certificate contracts I had executed and notarized at my workplace. I had been demanding to see the share registry to confirm my ownership % but the Vulture Circle wasn't about to let that happen! Why? They had illegally moved 46% of the company outside of our circle and along with the bribed on site managers, 5 , now multi millionaires, mov

AnónimoLitigant

abusive, pompous, arrogant, plaintiff and government bias.I was manipulated by the government to be a witness against...

2.0
/ 5

abusive, pompous, arrogant, plaintiff and government bias.I was manipulated by the government to be a witness against the defendant.I was scared. Judge treated everybody with hate and disdain.

AnónimoLegal Professional

I don't know how to rate this judge minus who tampered with evidence to aid and abet the defense lawyers who also fal...

2.0
/ 5

I don't know how to rate this judge minus who tampered with evidence to aid and abet the defense lawyers who also falsified evidence for the motion to dismiss the class action. BOTH exploited: (1) Rule 52(a) for the extorted "findings of fact" to keep the appellate away even in de novo review (See 1985 Amendment);(2) Rule 23(b)(2) for a class certification defense which Rule 52(a)(3) does NOT exclude(See 1966 Amendment); and (3) Rule 54(b)which the district court controls when an appellate court is required to hear an appeal. This judge violated the 14th Amendment and obstructed the court proceeding, despite the defense lawyers confessed to falsification in the only hearing 9 years later. If you need to know more on the systemic loopholes, please contact me. We need to protect the integrity of judicial system.

AnónimoLitigant

The least congenial man in the building.

1.0
/ 5

The least congenial man in the building. Arrogant, boisterous, curt, and simply rude to people. Gets his jollies by denigrating attorneys. Do not dare cough in this courtroom; you will be reprimanded on the record for several minutes if you do so. Retire already.

AnónimoLegal Professional

Completely ignored facts.

1.0
/ 5

Completely ignored facts. Biased and definitely not even-handed or impartial.When presented with irrefutable evidence that he made a huge judgment error he refused to ackknowledge that the Dept of Labor suppressed totally exonerating evidence and Forged, modified, reworded and edited an official goverment document and submitted it as evidence early in the case expectibg the case to settle.When the case did not settle the US DOL proceeded to embark ib a character assasinating campaign to destroy the defendant ao he would not have the opportunity to afford the trial and the forged document and coverup would be seen in Discovery.Egregious violations of the defendants constitutional rights resulted,along with many millions of dollars in damages.The actual authentic document that was supressed by the DOL and modified to say the opposite of what it actually says was not discovered by defendant till after the wrongful judgement that the judge refused to overturn. There was only one thing before the judge in the case. whether or not the volunteer position was considered employment as far as the FLSA. The suppressed actual document explicitly provided a carveout and said the volunteer position did NOT constitute an employment relationship. The judge was WRONG and failed to take responsibility for his HUGE mistake. Arrogant, unfair, demeaning and intoxicated with power.Potentially senile and impaired. A danger to citizens.

AnónimoLawyer

Whoever made this judge miserable in his lifetime, he hasn't forgotten it and takes it out on everyone who comes befo...

1.0
/ 5

Whoever made this judge miserable in his lifetime, he hasn't forgotten it and takes it out on everyone who comes before him. Quick tempered, bizarre, probably senile, and will lecture you on the record for four to five minutes if you so much as cough or sneeze in his courtroom. Don't dare be late. His hearings begin at 8:00 a.m. because he's got no life. A complete mad man in need of being in power.

AnónimoLegal Professional