William Anklowitz

He’s very bias he sides with JOSEPH MOONEY ON ALL LANDLORD TENANT CASES WITHOUT REVIEWING TENANTS DOCUMENTS, etc. Both this judge and Mooney are horrible and they are being paid by the Jewish landlords on the side to win cases

Was before him on a small claims case. Bought an argument by defense counsel that because they didn't consent to being sued that I could not sure them. Who consents to being sued? If every judge bought that argument, they should just do away with attorneys and hang a sign on the court house to use this defense.

William Anklowitz is unfit to be a judge. He should be removed from the bench, and disbarred from practicing law. He is biased, vindictive. Importantly, he ignores and circumvents the law to issue rulings to his liking. He abuses his authority to inflict harm; and his rulings are "Horrific" injustice.

This is one of the worst judges ever. He is mean, short-tempered, has no patience and has no respect for people or their issues. [Redacted by Ed.] He doesn't listen to the parties and has no patience with pro se litigants. He should be removed from the bench due to his issues. He says things that he shouldn't say. I hope that he is dealt with according to how he deals with people. If he [Redacted by Ed.] has any legal issues, I hope that they have to stand before a judge just like him who does not even care.

He is a horrible judge with a very impatient, bitter, arrogant and rude disposition. He does not care about rent-paying tenants being taken advantage of by a slumlord landlord and living in unsafe conditions, especially during COVID when it was hard to relocate. He is a blight upon New Jersey's judiciary system. More people should begin to complain about him so that something can be done. He preys on what he thinks are disadvantaged people and is especially despicable when tenants are representing themselves.

Judge Anklowitz has an extremely unpleasant disposition and is not even-handed. He is tenant-friendly to the point of advocating on their behalf. Dislike and disregard of female attorneys is apparent. Is not accommodating of technical difficulties in remote matters and is easily frustrated. Does not employ basic legal reasoning. Does not review motion papers or evidence. Ignores proper legal arguments. Makes up non-legal reasons to side on behalf of the tenant.