Yvonne Esperanza Campos

She is totally abusive and should be removed for the public good. Her "ruling" was overturned by the Appellate Division after I filed a "Petition for Writ" and she was removed from the case by both me and the Appellate Division. She gave no legal basis for her biased ruling, and when I managed to get a word in to ask the basis of her ruling she snarled, "...the laws of Department 501". She does not make the laws, the legislature does, and she is totally improper and biased. In a case I witnessed, in which a court translator had not shown up for a litigant who was losing his business lease, she said that, regardless of the interpreter or not, her ruling stays the same, so the case is decided regardless of the failure of the court to provide an interpreter, which was so improper I was sick to see that done to the elderly man who just lost his bakery. There is no way the positive reviews on this site are real, in my opinion, after seeing her in action.

Talks over you. Is determined to rule however she intends to without allowing you or affording you to exercise your rights. She forced a court trial when there was a clear request for a jury trial and refused to hear that one had been requested and entered into the online ROA, twice. Had the ruling not been favorable, an appeal was going to have to be rendered. This judge can rule many different ways and often many of her rulings have been & can be reversed upon appeal.