William Alsup

8 years, 8 years ago I first appeared before this Individual Creton with Power. I have been patient as Job, but [redacted by Ed.]. $160 Million securities fraud on 14 people, the largest fraud ever filed on Ca's central coast re INTELL PROPERTIES I HELPED develop in my homes, USED IN THE I PHONE RE DIGIT ADVERT, 14 founders/IP Developers filed in a county court, that couldn't afford to litigate the matter, all of us never had a single day in court. Instead, I was before the Creton singularly to void the state judgment for fraud on the court, first entering courts alone, and he wrote false orders from day one, gleefully; misquoted a record that did not in fact exist, ignored corporate officials attested documents in my favor proving my claims, proceeded to prosecute me by NEVER allowing me subpoena power. Despite my win of a CA demurrer and discovery order, that he and the other state "actors" have sought to destroy the history of that little uncomfortable fact by covering and concealing it by refusing to ever, even once address that matter; Alsup, for his D cronies in the state courts, instead of doing his FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES, ditch the Amendments and set about making sure I was being cheated further of my Federal protections, i.e. the FACT OF my orig judge retiring and the replacement CA "judge" being appointed to the bench against me by...wait for it..."DEFENDANTS BUSINESS PARTNER" yep! Def's OWNED at the time,,,100% of the ENTIRE TERMINATE"HER" movie franchise..... ALSUP, like the DEF replacement, never allowed me SUBPOENA POWERS as the US SUPREME COURT has instructed to get to the "merits" of a pro se's matter BEFORE DISMISSING CLAIMS "procedurally"; Instead, for the state cronies; HE PROSECUTED ME WITH GLEE as a perjurer upholding a criminal CA granted million dollar judgment PUSHED By TEN non percipient "OFF I C(H)ERS " of Court, with NOT ONE DEF OR CORPORATE COUNSEL,ever IN YEARS attesting the FORGERY OR ANY SECONDARY EVIDENCE OF IT!! a fake lawsuit, fake "$50K Supposed SETTLEMENT" CON tract that he refuses anyone to show him evidence of !! All he does is allow them to LIE WITH only a FRAUD EXHIBIT corp counsel emailed me THAT I CALLED A FRAUD From day one!! NO EVIDENCE under ANY FED OR CA CODE and he WONT MAKE THEM SHOW INK!! HE AND ALL THE OTHER "JUDGES" CANT MAKE ONE EVIDENTIARY CODE CA, or FED RULING, I AM NOW EXISTING in a vehicle because of a FEDERAL JUDGE sadistically pushing a FORGERY still on my head by the dirty, 10 FRAUD LITIGATIONS HEDGE FUND. 10 fraud litigations that they lost, lawsuits with people they owed fiduciary duties to. A FEDERAL JUDGE UPHOLDING FRAUDSTERS THAT IN FACT WERE FOUND guilty of "willful, deliberate 17 thousand pages of accounting evidence destruction, DURING COURT PROCEEDINGS"; now that the truth is surfacing about these high ca state politicians and national politicians involvement in this matter FOR YEARS, including ATTEMPTING TO OVERTURN A CA 40 YEAR MERGER LAW THAT PROTECTED OUR CLAIMS, the state appellate court records boxes destruction of AUGUST 2 0 2 5, WHEREFROM EVIDENCE WAS IN FACT "CREATED" FROM MY APPEAL APPENDIX by a CA JUDGE building "such" by "picking and choosing" PAGES!! LABELED "PERJUROUS DECLARATION OF Attorney HURLY" a 4 page FORGERY ALLEGED ITEM that NO DEF OR Pltf, me, EVER attested, filed, argued, referred to or other, BUT THE CA APPEAL JUDGE CREATED at material variance to 4 jurisdictions GRANTING RJN of the DeFENDANTS OF NO SUCH ITEM AS EXTANT but INSTEAD as being a "3 page item" INSTEAD THE FED COURT went along, by extrajudicial "communications" with CA APPELLATE Judges "CREATING" a 3 page item THAT THEY ADDED, the CA APPELLATE JUDGE PERREN OF SECOND DISTR 6th DIV CREATED A 4 page ITEM WITH MY SIGNATURE FROM A FRAUD IN THE EXECUTION ITEM I have alleged a FRAUD for 15 years AGAINST A HEDGE FUND GROUP ALLEGED IN TWO LAW SUITS [in addition to the 8 SUITS ALL LOST in FED/CA Courts of FRAUD re FIDUCIARY DUTIES] OF FRAUD ON THE EXECUTION ACTS ON A OLDER WOMAN TO STEAL HER MILLION DOLLAR PROPERTY , just like me!! they took MY SIGNATURE AND CHANGED OUT PAGES, and they WERE MY FIDUCIARIES,,,just like the other woman!! THE SECOND DISTRICT TO HIDE THESE CRIMES, the DAY I FILED MY EN BANC PETITION, they ORDERED THE BOXES JUDGE PERREN CREATED THAT 4 page item from the perjury allegation, they ORDERED THE DESTRUCTION OF 5 BANKER BOXES!! AND BURNED ALL OF THEM THE DAY the pending en banc proceeding ENDED< the EXACT 90th DAY August 11, Look it up CA Second Dist - 6th Div B243554. But NOW, they've got a REAL PROBLEM, last week, the discovery of back up evidence that doubles the destroyed appellate records boxes, AN EARLIER 3 year OLDER APPEAL WITH THE SAME EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANTS MULTIPLE FILINGS OF MULTIPLE COUNTY REQUESTED JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE 3 page NO SIGNATURE ITEM at material VARIANCE TO THE CA Appellate JUDGES and THIS FEDERAL JUDGE CREATED "EVIDENCE",,,now, this WEEK, the State Supreme Court Justice letter apprising me of my state "rights" when she said I was too "late", forget the fact that she was the law and equity partner of the international law firm DEF Counsel, who REFUSED TO ATTEST THE FORGERY HE WIRED ME THAT I PRINTED OUT AND CALLED A FRAUD FOR ALL THESE YEARS; forget the FACT OF THE DEFS paying her, OUR STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, the profits of the frauds taken upon myself and my co founders at the time the acts were taken, Alsup is in thick with the lot of them, shame, he couldn't write one lousy sentence in his 2 page limp "order" that had any factual reference to a court record, a court hearing, evidence code, federal rules of procedure, let alone evidence, he's just a Slander Slut outtah Miss sucking up to his Harvard-ees early early on, so as to get in with The Club, enjoying life, yet, he still can't seem to have me charged with crimes, cuz I'm not a liar or a criminal, even though in his "civil" proceeding, he treated me as such, year after year to keep that $160M scam going for his D cronies...FAIL

Hopelessly out of touch with anyone but himself. Will babble on for 5 minutes on the record if someone coughs, sneezes or clears their throat in his courtroom. He chastised a fairly young hardworking female attorney for "looking unwell" and coughing in his courtroom. A nut case.

Please do a search on this San Diego Law Review, Volume 1, Issue 1 (1964) on "findings of fact" for FRCP 54(c) and 15(b) - in connection with FRCP 8(c)(1) for a falsified "affirmative defenses" under the long list therefor. This article explained the duty of district judges. The gaping loophole created by the one-sided plausibility pleading for ALL cases under Ashcroft v. Iqbal can be exploited by fraudsters that plaintiff cannot know or respond. But the fraudulent scheme will also void 28 U.S.C. §1331 and §1291 -- meaning "appellate jurisdiction" for "mandamus" under Article III of the Constitution cannot compel the lower courts to respond in absence of jurisdiction. Only DOJ has the Constitutional authority to take over and enforce a federal law. Cf. 28 U.S.C. §2072(b), when a judge also exploits the procedural due process. DOJ has the "duty" under 28 U.S.C. §547 to enforce a federal law. Marbury v. Madison jurisprudence should be used to support the DOJ duty (and that of the states). Legal community (judges included) should be aware of the epic harm on the judicial system from the combination. I went through hell (even with a legal team for the class action) in the last 13+ years. Contact me if you want.

Brady Material is evidence helpful to a person accused of a crime. Prosecution lost Brady Material in criminal trial against me. Alsup denied my motion seeking the Brady material. I believe that every party seeking justice should avoid appearing before alsup.

Today, the 9th Upheld this man's slanderous, life defining destruction order upon me. I will never get over this, ever. This man, cut and paste the Def's slanderous allegations in their dismissal motions and then committed his own full fledged assault on my character and person. He told me I had a "Victim Complex"....that I had a "habit" of "always being the victim". The facts, etched in stone of numerous dockets around the State of CA is the following; I helped develop IP that is used in and of support of the IPHONE, that was created in my own home, leased in my name, for years. For this, I was promised a small %. Years after that promise, I had to hire counsel to have the % in fact "formalized", which occurred within a 45 minute court session with no arguments, everyone involved knew the % was mine. Next up! Within DAYS: Enter the Vulture, the thieving kind, tied to the hip of Judges, District Attorneys, City Attorneys, State SEnators heading up "Judiciary Committees" you name it, they have it! The vultures weren't about to have a trained accountant that might ask to look at books and records at any point in time of their scheme to steal the IP of myself and my co founders, like they had done across the state to many other family owned business' with valuable IP's; the Vultures set about lying to Courts, extorting the founders and myself for signatures to move securities representing our valuable, $165M intell properties over a 8 year period. The day the I Phone was announced to the WORLD I was ambushed, no attorney, with a witness, I went to pick up 5-6 replacement stock certificates for the 5-6 replacement stock certificate contracts I had executed and notarized at my workplace. I had been demanding to see the share registry to confirm my ownership % but the Vulture Circle wasn't about to let that happen! Why? They had illegally moved 46% of the company outside of our circle and along with the bribed on site managers, 5 , now multi millionaires, mov

abusive, pompous, arrogant, plaintiff and government bias.I was manipulated by the government to be a witness against the defendant.I was scared. Judge treated everybody with hate and disdain.

I don't know how to rate this judge minus who tampered with evidence to aid and abet the defense lawyers who also falsified evidence for the motion to dismiss the class action. BOTH exploited: (1) Rule 52(a) for the extorted "findings of fact" to keep the appellate away even in de novo review (See 1985 Amendment);(2) Rule 23(b)(2) for a class certification defense which Rule 52(a)(3) does NOT exclude(See 1966 Amendment); and (3) Rule 54(b)which the district court controls when an appellate court is required to hear an appeal. This judge violated the 14th Amendment and obstructed the court proceeding, despite the defense lawyers confessed to falsification in the only hearing 9 years later. If you need to know more on the systemic loopholes, please contact me. We need to protect the integrity of judicial system.

The least congenial man in the building. Arrogant, boisterous, curt, and simply rude to people. Gets his jollies by denigrating attorneys. Do not dare cough in this courtroom; you will be reprimanded on the record for several minutes if you do so. Retire already.

Completely ignored facts. Biased and definitely not even-handed or impartial.When presented with irrefutable evidence that he made a huge judgment error he refused to ackknowledge that the Dept of Labor suppressed totally exonerating evidence and Forged, modified, reworded and edited an official goverment document and submitted it as evidence early in the case expectibg the case to settle.When the case did not settle the US DOL proceeded to embark ib a character assasinating campaign to destroy the defendant ao he would not have the opportunity to afford the trial and the forged document and coverup would be seen in Discovery.Egregious violations of the defendants constitutional rights resulted,along with many millions of dollars in damages.The actual authentic document that was supressed by the DOL and modified to say the opposite of what it actually says was not discovered by defendant till after the wrongful judgement that the judge refused to overturn. There was only one thing before the judge in the case. whether or not the volunteer position was considered employment as far as the FLSA. The suppressed actual document explicitly provided a carveout and said the volunteer position did NOT constitute an employment relationship. The judge was WRONG and failed to take responsibility for his HUGE mistake. Arrogant, unfair, demeaning and intoxicated with power.Potentially senile and impaired. A danger to citizens.

Whoever made this judge miserable in his lifetime, he hasn't forgotten it and takes it out on everyone who comes before him. Quick tempered, bizarre, probably senile, and will lecture you on the record for four to five minutes if you so much as cough or sneeze in his courtroom. Don't dare be late. His hearings begin at 8:00 a.m. because he's got no life. A complete mad man in need of being in power.

This guy is the absolute worst. Totally inconsistent, biased, prejudiced, temperamental, jumps to conclusions where he has no information, expertise or experience. Makes unfair predictions.He is so bad I think he must be senile, cognitively impaired or mild to medium dementia. he has to be tested for these and has NO business being on the bench. These guys should never be appointed for more than 8 years and should be tested every 1-2 years.

Your decision on the homeless in Berkeley is really sad, take a look at what the homeless are doing to our major cities, many like myself do not go to San Francisco, Oakland or Berkeley ( I am a Berkeley grad. } anymore to the filth and crime. I do not like being hassled by the homeless for money etc. John Thelen

Has a community college teachers legal intellect worthy of ridicule and disdain.

Judge Alsup is very bright, exceptionally hard-working, highly knowledgeable, and a trial attorney's judge, all of which are superb. My only significant complaint is that his rocket-docket is a forced death march into professional exhaustion. I appeared before him in a highly complex case for product counterfeiting in which we had numerous parties and cross-actions. Incredibly, he made wise, well-informed rulings on key issues on remarkably short notice time after time, even ruling against me on my key affirmative defense (but in a careful ruling, with which I still disagree). I have only praise, except for the unrealistic calendaring, which was just about unmanageable. Otherwise, I highly recommend him. He is uncommonly bright and fair, and he knows how to get to the point. He is unpredictable and mercurial, but overall a very astute federal judge.

This judge is the poster child for why federal judges should not be appointed for life. He is imperious and has no regard for litigants. His hearings are at 8:00 a.m. and because he does not permit telephonic appearances ("under any circumstances"), out of town attorneys are required to spend the night in San Francisco, unnecessarily increasing the costs of litigation. He demands appearances on issues that should be decided without argument and then, does not even listen to the argument. What an ass!

If you want a judge that follows the civil rules, makes proper exceptions when needed. And, what I like most, tell you how it is or how he sees things, then this is your man. He seems gruff, but if you have a good case and you show up prepared, I don't think there is anything to worry about. This opinion is based on a pretty contentious employment matter, with close discovery disputes and SJ, and (despite the anxiety fostered by these reviews) I think he was a good judge for the case.

Believes himself to be insightful, but often fails to understand basic legal issues. Can be nasty and petty when he feels challenged by counsel. His main concern is hurrying things along.

The other reviews of J. Alsup are far too generous. He is the worst kind of judge. He has no business being on the bench. He issues absurd rulings simply to punish counsel. He gets hung up on hypertechnical issues totally unrelated to the merits. And if he doesn't like you or your client, watch out. Every little thing will go against you. If he won't retire, I may have to consider retiring myself or moving.

Assumes the worst of lawyers appearing in his courtroom. Vindictive and egotistical.

I find this judge unable to fairly observe the facts. Terribly temperamental, he tries to bully people in his courtroom, especially pro se litigants. This erratic behavior gets in the way of the process. He will retaliate when he is angered by whatever he perceives as a problem. Rudeness and unnecessary disrespect to a degree simply intolerable in a federal judge. He is obviously intelligent, which only raises the question as to why he acts the way he does.